VOL. LIII, NO. 107
California State University, Long Beach April 23, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Kimberly Pasquis
Editor in Chief

Rachelle Youngman
Managing Editor

Miguel Lopez
News Editor

Sonya Smith
Assistant News Editor

Justin Dimert
City Editor

Franklin Holman
Assistant City Editor

Tina Page
Opinion Editor

Jack Schneider
Diversions Editor

Todd Leland
Sports Editor

Brian Brannon
Photo Editor

Johnathan Cook
Chief Photo Editor

Michael Watanabe
Make-Up Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Ourview

Bill protects transsexuals


New laws protecting against discrimination surface at a seemingly constant rate. Discrimination laws protect minorities, religious groups, gays and lesbians, women and numerous other groups from being treated unfairly because of their group affiliation.
 
It seems that we may have forgotten one group — transsexuals. AB 196 by Assemblyman Mark Leno D-San Francisco passed the Assembly Monday to make it illegal for landlords and employers to discriminate against people who have changed their gender or whose gender is not exclusively male or female.
 
The bill has passed the Assembly and is now expected to be passed by the Senate. Isn’t it odd that we must continue to pass specific laws against discrimination? Shouldn’t all discrimination be against the law?
 
Apparently the reason that not discriminating against transsexuals is an issue and not just an understood no-no is because employers may be faced with what Republicans have termed an unfair burden. Republicans argued “that Leno’s legislation would prevent a business owner from controlling the image projected by his or her business,” the Los Angeles Times reported.
 
This argument is difficult to support because the bill would allow employers to set standards of appearance, grooming and dress, as long as a worker is allowed to dress consistently with his or her preferred gender.
 
Opponents also argue that it is unfair to impose such a law because people may be morally opposed to transgender behavior. It is a shame that some people allow the harmless behavior of others to create bitterness and unhappiness in their own lives. But we are living in a society that we would like to believe we are improving upon. Completely abolishing discrimination and hatred seems impossible, but striving to attain this goal is vital to a progressive society.
 
The bill passed 41 to 34, with five Assembly members not voting. Assemblyman John Longville D-Rialto compared the transsexual bill to that of the civil rights legislation of the 1960s that banned discrimination against people based on skin color.
 
“Think about how you’re going to explain your vote two or three decades down the road to your grandchildren,” Longville cautioned the Assembly.
 
Longville is right. History has taught us that people resist change and are hesitant to accept behavior different from their own. In the ’60s, it was not that unusual to discriminate against blacks. Today, most of us would be offended by such bigotry. The same will someday apply to transsexuals.
 
As Thomas Paine so eloquently stated, “A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right and raises at first a formidable outcry in defense of custom.”


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

Sports

.... Beach coaching vacancies become a case of loyalty

.... Spring Break Scoreboard

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved