VOL. LIII, NO. 120
California State University, Long Beach May 15, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Kimberly Pasquis
Editor in Chief

Rachelle Youngman
Managing Editor

Miguel Lopez
News Editor

Sonya Smith
Assistant News Editor

Justin Dimert
City Editor

Franklin Holman
Assistant City Editor

Tina Page
Opinion Editor

Jack Schneider
Diversions Editor

Todd Leland
Sports Editor

Brian Brannon
Photo Editor

Johnathan Cook
Chief Photo Editor

Michael Watanabe
Make-Up Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Proposed budget not to include fee increase for CSU


By Jill Thomsen
On-line Forty-Niner

Gov. Gray Davis’ “May Revise” proposal calls for sharp tax increases but no further cuts to the California State University system budget.

The “May Revise” is the governor’s second proposal of the year on how he believes the state budget should be handled. Presented after state income taxes have been processed, the “May Revise” is more accurate with regards to the economic health of the state and often differs greatly from the governor’s initial proposals in January.

The governor’s January budget proposal called for a systemwide 25 percent fee increase for undergraduates and 20 percent increase for graduate students. The increase was not altered yesterday despite concerns by the Board of Trustees and student leaders that further cuts may have been recommended.

Although the governor’s recommendations are a key step in the budget process, the legislature still has final say on what programs will be cut, how much money the state will attempt to borrow and how much taxes will be increased.

Karen Zamarripa, assistant vice chancellor in the CSU office of governmental affairs, said that the Board of Trustees will be waiting to see how the legislature reacts to the proposals.

“We need to wait and see how can we gage when we’re going to have a final budget so we can decide when to tell students how much their fees will be,” she said. “We’re waiting to see how quickly the legislature acts or doesn’t.”

Zamarripa said that if the legislature seems to be “gelling and people are starting to come around to it [the governor’s proposal] there might be a thought for a special meeting of the board and chancellor to decide on fees. The sooner they can tell students the better.”

However, Zamarripa said that if the budget is still in major dispute throughout the summer she is not sure what the board will do. Whatever happens, she said it will be publicly notified so everyone will have a chance to participate.

Catherine Hazleton, spokeswoman for the assembly of Higher Education Committee Chairwoman Carol Liu, D-La Canada Flintridge, said the assemblywoman is “thrilled to see how relatively well the different higher education segments fared in the May revise.”

Hazelton said that the reception towards the plan by legislators would probably not be known until budget committee meetings occur at the beginning of next week.

In the governor’s proposal new taxes on cars and cigarettes, along with a temporary one-half cent sales tax increase will help prevent further cuts to education. The proposal also includes a $304 million increase in community college funding from the January plan.

“It’s great news for the community colleges because that directly relates to us since so many of our students come from them,“ Zamarripa said.

The January proposal called for an increase of $24 per community college unit, but has been lowered to $18 in the revision.

“It’s absolutely wonderful,” said Laura Kerr, California State Student Association director of governmental affairs. “It’s probably the best thing we’ve been hearing recently but I wouldn’t get your hopes up too much — the battle is going to come this summer.”

Since the California state budget requires two-thirds approval for passage the minority party has an opportunity to hold up the process until it receives concessions from the dominant party. Republicans have said that they would not agree to any tax increase and their own proposal calls for a $200 million cut to the CSU system.

Assembly Democrats are also offering a separate plan that calls for a $69.5 million increase.

“Even though they [Republicans] are the minority party they are in the most powerful position,” said Kerr.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

Sports

.... The Road to Omaha will have to go through Dirtbags, Blair Field

.... Manarino, Cervenka lead 49er honors

.... Weaver, Tulowitzki garner Big West honors

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved