VOL. LIII, NO. 112
California State University, Long Beach May 1, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Kimberly Pasquis
Editor in Chief

Rachelle Youngman
Managing Editor

Miguel Lopez
News Editor

Sonya Smith
Assistant News Editor

Justin Dimert
City Editor

Franklin Holman
Assistant City Editor

Tina Page
Opinion Editor

Jack Schneider
Diversions Editor

Todd Leland
Sports Editor

Brian Brannon
Photo Editor

Johnathan Cook
Chief Photo Editor

Michael Watanabe
Make-Up Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Nudity can make or break a meaning


By Jack Schneider

On-line Forty-Niner

Take a look at pop-culture, and you might notice something that is surprisingly, ironic. Hollywood and magazines have taken a liking towards the phrase “less is more.” In some cases, scantily-clad people means more junk, while in other cases, nudity means more attention. What the two situations both deal with are the reactions brought on from the public eye.
 
New Line Cinema’s “The Real Cancun” debuted at no. 10 in the box office. The movie, which was produced by the producers of “The Real World” wanted to create a savvy, trendy movie that was sure to be a guaranteed hit. Were they ever wrong! Paul Dergarabedian, president of the box office tracking service Exhibitor Relations Co. said that this movie has the makings of a successful movie.
 
The executives at New Line Cinema, along with Dergarabedian, have exaggerated the use of nudity to win money for the movie industry, that it has merely lost its taste. No wonder “The Real Cancun” flopped at the box office. Film lovers and the 18 to 25-year-old crowd have probably seen too much filmed partying, and too much gratuitous nudity that it does not thrill them anymore. When you’ve seen one party in Cancun, you’ve pretty much seen them all, and probably didn’t pay $9 to see it. Despite all the clichéd use of nudity, there has been a different, more meaningful approach to the usage of skin.
 
As most students on this campus are aware, country sensations the Dixie Chicks posed nude last week on the cover of “Entertainment Weekly.” Lead singer Natalie Maines said in the magazine, “Trust me — we never wanted this much attention.” All three members of the group decided to pose nude, after numerous backlashes on how some believe they are “anti-war” or, perhaps they were astounded by the “Dixie Chicks Destruction Day” brought on by Louisiana station KRMD-FM.
 
The group chose to do a bold, but solidly ironic statement. If a person decides to pose nude in a magazine, then a lot of the public eye will notice. It’s obvious the Dixie Chicks want this type of attention. It is not for the reason of record sales or publicity, but because they want to throw the message back to all the discriminators of the group.
 
The relationship between the nudity in “Cancun” and the nudity with the Dixie Chicks is that they both contained ironic criticism. A film that pushes gratuitous nudity on movie goers will not receive attention. A country group who chooses to confront viewers in a prolific way will gain attention. With the use of nudity as a matter of expression, a statement should not be force-fed to a viewer, or else the meaning behind it is lost. This is the reason why “The Real Cancun” tanked, and the Dixie Chicks soared with a profound statement
 
No matter way a person looks as it, the meaning of “skin deep” in Hollywood and Nashville is as confusing as nudity itself. A new trend could occur from the outcome!



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

Sports

.... The Pyramid to host NCAA Final Four

.... 49ers head to UCLA, then Big West Championship

.... Dirtbags will need Freshmen to win

.... Four 49ers awarded All-conference honors

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved