VOL. LIII, NO. 108
California State University, Long Beach April 24, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Kimberly Pasquis
Editor in Chief

Rachelle Youngman
Managing Editor

Miguel Lopez
News Editor

Sonya Smith
Assistant News Editor

Justin Dimert
City Editor

Franklin Holman
Assistant City Editor

Tina Page
Opinion Editor

Jack Schneider
Diversions Editor

Todd Leland
Sports Editor

Brian Brannon
Photo Editor

Johnathan Cook
Chief Photo Editor

Michael Watanabe
Make-Up Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Silence the lawsuits, bring on the free downloads


By Jack Schneider

On-line Forty-Niner

Remember when a person could download a catchy or great tune without having to pay for the entire CD? Most college students remember when Napster was a popular web site where eager Internet browsers could download oodles of music for free. As soon as Napster rose to pirating fame, the controversies started.
 
Lawsuits were filed against Napster, and the company was tyring to make agreements. BMI music tried to correlate in downloading with Napster, so that every time a person would log on to the site, a fee would be charged. The plan never went through, and the stellar idea fizzled.
 
This week history is repeating itself. With yet another lawsuit against Napster. Two record companies, Universal Music and EMI filed a lawsuit on Monday, against Napster Inc., with major cases of copyright violations. As if the obvious statement about piriating wasn’t enough, the suit seeks $150,000 per violation. Making matters worse, this lawsuit intends to prevent other companies into creating a file-swapping service ever since Napster. Could there be a more ridiculous idea?
 
A good majority of students around Cal State Long Beach have probably heard of Limewire, WinMX, BearShare, Aimster and the ever famous Kazaa. These five companies have spawned ever since the decline of Napster. It’s been said before and it will be said again; there is no escape from Internet piracy.
 
However, there are ways to incorporate piracy, without depleting the usage of MP3s. Apple Computers, which is the creator of the ipod have incorporated a way to download music, and pay a fee with the ipod. This idea also correlates with Apple’s itunes, so people can get all the latest and greatest songs. Apple’s plan, unlike past ideas with Napster and BMI, incorporates all digital music, and could prove to be a successful plan. Best of all, Apple’s plan pays royalties to the record companies, proving to be a win-win situation for music downloaders (with enough money to pay for services) and record companies.
 
The issues of downloading music with Napster are all in the past. While some people see digital music as an opportunity for profit and correspondence with downloaders and record companies, others, like Universal and EMI, need to stop complaining about digital music. It’s about time both record companies and digital music stop complaining about each other, and find a common ground. If Apple’s digital music plan work, then the dispute between record companies and the people who download music won’t have to worry about who is getting the short end of the stick.


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

Sports

.... Dirtbag bats roar 11-5

.... 49er golf playoff hopes in the air

.... MPSF honors Beach volleyball players

.... U.S. Olympians search for talent at The Beach

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved