VOL. LIV, NO. 6
California State University, Long Beach September 9, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Jamie Oye
Assistant News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jack Scheneider
Assistant City Editor

Monica L. Pardee
Opinion Editor

Monica L. Clark
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jennifer Camacho
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Janet Gutierrez-Tostado
Floria Myung

Advertising Representatives

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Lego Hartanto
Production Staff

Carlo Dayrit
Justin Smith

Circulation Staff

 

. News  
 

Power to silence our voice

Give me liberty or give me death -- or so said Patrick Henry. But what was he really talking about? About tea taxes, stamp taxes or the basic human rights now guaranteed in the first ten amendments to the Constitution?

What does it mean to have the freedom of speech or freedom of the press? It means that people have the right to speak for what they believe in and speak against what they don't. But once that right has been invoked people often dislike people of other views partaking of the same right.

This hypocrisy, that only people supporting one view should be allowed to get their point across, can be viewed at all levels of society. Access to channels that allow the masses voice to be heard are limited. More common is a channel with an agenda, and that agenda will be met.

The concept of access is a strong basis of class. Access to resources, and ability to attain those resources is a strong measurement of power. The powerful can get their messages across. And often what appears to be a competing message is just a different way of saying the same message. It's just another powerful voice behind the scene.

More apparent than the powerful people behind the message are the corporate sponsors behind it. They support that message because it keeps you buying their product or just keeps you going along in the same way you always have, listening to the same old message.

So the powerful are backed up by other powers, whether its corporate sponsors or interest group lobbyists. The message's impact on you is redoubled, confirmed and imbedded firmly in your mind. Is this freedom of speech? Is this freedom of the press?

No. It's a concept that has been warped with mega-media mergers and our corporate president. The concept of a public forum is all but impossible with corporate media busy keeping their advertisers happy, their agenda setting is no longer premised as for the good of the people but admittedly for the good of the companies and the CEOs and the accountants.

Could Disney-owned ABC ever broadcast a breaking story on Disneyland hiring child-molesters? Would NBC create a hubbub about Microsoft? Chances are highly unlikely.

So who is being silenced? Everyone. Even the reporters and writers working for these companies are helpless to get some messages out. And the people are told what matters by the media gurus at the top.

Preservation of a public forum in independents, school papers, community newspapers and newsletters seem to be the only hope. With everyone but the smallest of the small so afraid to offend or lose the patronage of any company, no giant multinational conglomerate gets investigated, no unions are shaken up to see who is really calling the shots. And freedom does not ring.
 

 

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2003 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved