VOL. LIV, NO. 26
California State University, Long Beach October 14, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Jamie Oye
Assistant News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jack Scheneider
Assistant City Editor

Monica L. Pardee
Opinion Editor

Monica L. Clark
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jennifer Camacho
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Janet Gutierrez-Tostado
Floria Myung

Advertising Representatives

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Lego Hartanto
Production Staff

Carlo Dayrit
Justin Smith

Circulation Staff

 

. News  
 

Palestine cause of rough road to peace

Gerry Wachovsky

Throughout history, there have been feuds -- the Hatfields and McCoys; Republicans and Democrats; men and women; the list can go on and on. As of late, however, it seems that one particular feud has been growing rowdier by the day and despite the continuing attempt at a peace process, one group and one group alone continues to disrupt it. Ironically, the disrupting group is one of the two major groups that the peace process will benefit. The particular feud I am referring to is, of course, between the Israelis and the Palestinians, and the failure of the peace process is due, for the most part, to the Palestinians.

"Geneva Understandings" is the name of the new peace draft "formulated by members of the Israeli opposition and Palestinian officials," according to an article found on www.haaretzdaily.com. The article goes on to say that the draft -- which I believe to be particularly optimistic and dare I say ridiculous -- would have the Palestinians "concede the right of return [to Israel]" as well as "recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people." Now hold on just a second here! Are we not missing an integral point? The land of Israel was never called "Palestine"! Furthermore, there was never an official Palestinian Arab state! Anyone who says differently clearly does not have a firm grasp on history. It was never more than merely a region in the Middle East!

According to www.palestinefacts.org, following World War I, the League of Nations partitioned a chunk of land "originally 118,000 square kilometers" designed to establish "a national home for the Jewish people" in the region of Palestine. Today, a whopping 80 percent of this land set aside is now Jordan, which is the home of the majority of Palestinian Arabs, while the remaining 20 percent of land west of the Jordan River, is Israel. Note also that the "disputed territories" of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip are unarguably located within the land of Israel, or as I said before, the remaining 20 percent that was allocated to the Jews. The Palestinians should have been recognizing Israel ever since this land was partitioned, seeing as how they got the better part of the deal -- 80 percent of the land, to be exact! Such is the Palestinian mindset, however, as Yasser Arafat and the Palestinian Authority have proven time and time again -- it is either all or nothing. Anything in between is inferior.

I mentioned before that another part of the peace draft would have the Palestinians "concede the right of return [to Israel]." For those who do not know, this concept of a "right of return" refers to the Palestinians' fallacious belief that they were forcefully kicked out of land that was supposedly once theirs. Let us examine this by taking into account the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan, which the United Nations created in the hopes of solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This plan would have created an Israeli state and a Palestinian state side-by-side but the Palestinians rejected this, resulting in a mass departure of "roughly 30,000 wealthy Arabs who anticipated the upcoming war and fled to neighboring Arab countries to await its end," according to www.us-israel.org. Now, these Palestinian Arabs, not to mention many more, feel that they have a "right of return" to the land. It seems as though they are missing a crucial concept -- the Palestinian Arabs rejected the
1947 U.N. Partition Plan, creating all of these refugees! I think www.us-israel.org sums it up best when it says: "Had the Arabs accepted the 1947 U.N. resolution, not a single Palestinian would have become a refugee."
 
There are, of course, literally tons of other factors that play into this continuing conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians, but to sum up why this peace process has been unsuccessful I will say the following: as long as the Palestinians continue to be unable to reason with, the fighting will continue. Time and time again, the Palestinians have had deals and peace plans on the table and every time they have rejected it. This, of course, is due to a deep-rooted hatred for Jews and Israelis, but one would think that by now the differences between the two people could have been set aside and the problems sorted out. Apparently this is too much to ask, when one group, namely the Palestinians, cannot get over their selfishness and abhorrence for the other group that would gladly be their peaceful neighbors.

Gerry Wachovsky is a broadcast journalism major at Cal State Long Beach and can be reached at SenorBucho@aol.com.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2003 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved