VOL. LIV, NO. 22
California State University, Long Beach October 7, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Jamie Oye
Assistant News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jack Scheneider
Assistant City Editor

Monica L. Pardee
Opinion Editor

Monica L. Clark
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jennifer Camacho
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Janet Gutierrez-Tostado
Floria Myung

Advertising Representatives

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Lego Hartanto
Production Staff

Carlo Dayrit
Justin Smith

Circulation Staff

 

. News  
 

Our View: Nature versus nurture on sex orientation a redundancy

So much time and research has been devoted to finding out what the truth is. Are people born like that or do they become that. It is not just about sexual orientation though, almost any trait in a human personality can be questioned like this. Why do some people have bad tempers, why are some people pathological liars, why are some people sickly sweet?

Nature versus nurture, it is an age-old question. It's genetic, no, it's learned, oh wait it's genetic again. The scientists are always going back and forth between these two extremes, maybe depending on who is funding them.

But now, when scientists are studying blink reaction time in heterosexual and homosexual test subjects to see which reacted in an uninhibited way we have to ask ourselves is does it really matter?

The difference in involuntary reaction times of heterosexual men and women compared with homosexual men and women is hardly something worth basing the study of nature and nurture on in regards to sexual orientation. But that is just what a group of scientists have done.

There have been so many studies in regards to this. What could this information, if it was ever proven, do for the world. The doctors say it would be easier to diagnose psychiatric problems if they knew how the brain of gay and lesbians work, but we're not buying it.

What could knowing that people are born homosexual really do? Is that an excuse, a justification or just a casual conversation piece? Shouldn't it be just as justifiable if not only is it not by nature, but that people just chose to be homosexual. They weren't abused or exposed to certain behaviors but that's just how they feel. Shouldn't that be just as acceptable as it being a genetic or if their upbringing led them to be that way.

Continuous research on where this homosexual "trait" comes from makes it seem more like a disease than a way of life for 4 percent of men and 3 percent of women. And furthermore, whether it is learned or inborn the fact remains, that is just the way it is and all the research in the world is not going to change anything.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

.... Governor-to-be faces daunting task
....
Graduation fees vary by each campus
....
Vehicle registration fee significant recall issue
....
News in a few
....
Meningitis causes concern in colleges
....
Half of middle-income Americans worry about finances

Opinion

.... Our View: Nature versus nurture on sex orientation a redundancy
.... The procrastinator's guide to the recall Election
.... Letter to the editor: Students should prevent mishaps

.... Onstage suicide as an artistic expression
.... Comic Strip

 

Diversions

.... MFA students choreograph new works
....
CSULB film grad shows skills with 'Debut'
.... Film review: Coppola back with poignant, funny 'Lost in Translation' starring Murray, Johansson
.... BOOK review: 'Postcards' combine tragedy, emotions tenderly
.... Sub-culture bands promote new music genre

 

Sports

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2003 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved