VOL. LIV, NO. 19
California State University, Long Beach October 1 , 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Jamie Oye
Assistant News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jack Scheneider
Assistant City Editor

Monica L. Pardee
Opinion Editor

Monica L. Clark
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jennifer Camacho
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Janet Gutierrez-Tostado
Floria Myung

Advertising Representatives

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Lego Hartanto
Production Staff

Carlo Dayrit
Justin Smith

Circulation Staff

 

. News  
 

Our View: Small business insurance beneficial

If universal health insurance is such a lofty goal, it may be because businesses are unwilling to take on any responsibility for their workers. Employers use their employees everyday, to make products, to make money and to make the wheels of the economy turn. But when it comes to taking care of the people who make all their money, businessmen seem to bow out of the limelight, saying they don't have enough money to take care of anybody except themselves.

According to the Health Care Workers Union, more than 6 million residents of California are without health insurance over the course of a year. Out of 36 million residents that may not sound like a lot, but how many of those are children that with their parents are then automatically covered by Medi-Cal. How much cheaper would it be on the state if businesses would take responsibility for these people rather than the states health system?

Also an issue is the fact that the uninsured populace often do not get preventative care that could shorten the amount of time at the end of their lives. This end-of-life time is often spent on the state's tab if the person does not have insurance, and this full-time care costs a great deal more than a few prescriptions and office visits.

The outcry from business people and politicians may also be exaggerated. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation more than 80 percent of employers who have more than 10 employees already provide insurance. So then all this noise and complaining is over the last 20 percent of cheapskates who claim they cannot afford to give their employees the opportunity?

More than 98 percent of the employers in the state would not even be affected by this bill. All the propaganda against the bill is just another attempt by our corporate controlled GOP party to keep the United States in the dark ages with public healthcare.

What the anti-SB2 faction want you to believe is that this measly percentage of employers that will be affected and who will be forced to do what is right in the first place is going to break the bank of the California economy.

The economy is already messed up, and the state is already taking care of all the people who are unemployed. Why do these businesses believe that they should not have to be held accountable for their employees? Shouldn't they care whether or not their workers are well enough to make them a profit? Maybe when all their workers are sick they will realize that without the workers, they are not only worthless, but they are going to be worried about a lot more than how to pay for health insurance. They might actually have to work themselves.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2003 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved