VOL. LIV, NO. 15
California State University, Long Beach September 24, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Jamie Oye
Assistant News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jack Scheneider
Assistant City Editor

Monica L. Pardee
Opinion Editor

Monica L. Clark
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jennifer Camacho
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Janet Gutierrez-Tostado
Floria Myung

Advertising Representatives

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Lego Hartanto
Production Staff

Carlo Dayrit
Justin Smith

Circulation Staff

 

. News  
 

Our View: Who has the right to breathe

Some of the classrooms on this campus are part of the original structures that stood here when this college was opened. Some of these classrooms are filled with dead, stagnant air that could have been circulating for that entire time. Some of us get stuck in these classrooms with the windows closed. And then somebody walks in with a half-gallon of perfume coating every surface of their body and creates a toxic cloud of chemicals, odor and impending misery for far more than one student in the room.

It is a huge issue in all parts of the country, who has the greater right to the air? Of course, the nationwide saga involves smoking rather than perfume, but it is a similar situation. Smokers argue that they have a right to do as they please, whereas the non-smokers argue that since everyone is subjected to the smoke they have no such right.

Perfume works about the same. I agree that people have that basic right to wear whatever scent they desire, whether wretched or lovely. But in a situation where a large group of people are forced to share a small space with limited ventilation, a problem occurs. Where does your air end and our air begin, and why should our air be polluted by your smell?

It would not be such a big deal if we only disliked the smell. Perfume is a subjective art and we do not expect to enjoy everybody's taste. But becoming physically sick with chemically induced headaches, nausea and sensitivity to light is far from simply disliking someone's choice in brands.

How do you tell someone that they are making other people sick? How would a school make a policy that could protect everybody without violating anybody's rights? And whose rights should be preserved?

It may not be an issue to be tackled by the American Civil Liberties Union, but there are students out there suffering in silence and there are co-workers who cannot speak up. Does this count as a medical condition and should there be laws or policies? Or should people just have some common courtesy and refrain from wearing perfume or cologne when the people around them are a captive audience? If people could limit their use of strong perfumes than everybody could go to school without having to worry about wearing a full-face respirator or living in a plastic bubble.

 

 

 

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2003 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved