VOL. LIV, NO. 13
California State University, Long Beach September 22, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Jamie Oye
Assistant News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jack Scheneider
Assistant City Editor

Monica L. Pardee
Opinion Editor

Monica L. Clark
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jennifer Camacho
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Janet Gutierrez-Tostado
Floria Myung

Advertising Representatives

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Lego Hartanto
Production Staff

Carlo Dayrit
Justin Smith

Circulation Staff

 

. News  
 

Letters to the editor: In response

In her Sept. 17 letter to the editor, Christine Eyre decided to attack the credibility of Dr. Matt Taylor instead of his arguments. Angelika Meyer cited Dr. Taylor's views in her Sept. 15 article on SB-60, which gives illegal immigrants the right to obtain a driver's license in California. Christine committed a clear ad hominem fallacy in her reasoning, going after the person, not the argument.

Dr. Matt Taylor is a tenure-track assistant professor of Communication Studies at Cal State Long Beach. He is a rhetorical scholar, critic and skilled debater, as well as the director of the nationally competitive CSULB Forensics, or Speech & Debate, Team. When it comes to argumentation and debate, his credibility, scholarship and expertise speaks for itself.
While I agree with Christine in pointing out that the news article focused only on the views of those supporting the bill, I disagree with her assumption that all illegal immigrants should be punished because some "may be" terrorists. To say so would be a hasty generalization. Those who might be terrorists, criminals, or under-age people, who want to buy tobacco and alcohol, can easily obtain a driver's license, whether it is legal or illegal. We might as well abolish all drivers' licenses for everybody, because there might be some legal residents or even citizens who "might" be terrorists.

Christine's opinion inherently assumes that illegal immigrants are evil people who like to lie and forge documents. Racist and classist immigration laws aside, most of the people affected by SB-60 are hard working civilized individuals who are working their backs off to support themselves and their families.

Politicians and interest groups that oppose SB-60 would not support cracking down on illegal immigrants and kicking all those two million people out. A crackdown would destroy California's agricultural industry and force those big Republican corporations to pay minimum wage or higher to their employees. Many companies depend on the near-slave labor of illegal immigrants. They will never support the internal enforcement of immigration laws; yet, they will oppose a law that attempts to make the lives of their employees easier. The reality is that there are two million illegal immigrants in California, and they are here to stay. You can either recognize them as people who have rights, or you can advocate a crackdown to remove them.

-- Usama Kahf,
Graduate student Communication Studies

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2003 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved