VOL. LIV, NO. 13
California State University, Long Beach September 22, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Jamie Oye
Assistant News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jack Scheneider
Assistant City Editor

Monica L. Pardee
Opinion Editor

Monica L. Clark
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jennifer Camacho
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Janet Gutierrez-Tostado
Floria Myung

Advertising Representatives

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Lego Hartanto
Production Staff

Carlo Dayrit
Justin Smith

Circulation Staff

 

. News  
 

Our View: Hypocrites should not prosper

In another Bush administration patch-up, Bush seems to have recanted his claims that ousted despot Saddam Hussein was indeed integrally linked to both al-Qaeda and the devastating attacks on Sept. 3. In the months before his attempted re-election, Bush has realized that the inconsistencies and fibs he has created, whether to garner support for his ill-begotten war or his failing economic policy, may start to catch up with him.

When after four glorious years he has accomplished little except throwing our once flourishing economy into a sink hole and threatening to revoke many of our basic civil liberties to "protect" us from further mishap, maybe his people have given him the heads up. He is going to need a better answer than that Jesus is his favorite philosopher to get re-elected in 2004.

Some of his main assertions for going to war with Iraq were both enthusiastic certainty that weapons of mass destruction were being produced in Iraq and also of course "saving" the Iraqi people -- although they don't seem to want our "help" now. And then later when support for the war began to slack Bush proposed the newly fabricated connection between Saddam and bin Laden.

This is laughable due to the secular nature of Hussein's dictatorship and his brutal suppression of a large portion of the Muslim population in Iraq, which might have angered bin Laden, since he is a religious beacon to many in the Middle East. Despite the similar outcries made at the time of the association made by Bush that the two men have nothing in common and could quite possibly hate each other due to differences in view, Bush continued misleading America to believe that these two men were cohorts of sorts.

Some theories on why Bush might have made this connection? First, to suit his own agenda of course. Second because with the dreaded Osama still on the loose after all our efforts in Afghanistan came to nothing, Bush needed a head on his wall so as not to look like the fool. Now he comes out, not to admit that he made a false claim, but to deny that he ever made one at all.

When will Bush stop saying one thing, meaning another and then after six months denying it all? People need to wake the government up to the fact that we won't be duped any more, at least not by Bush for another four years.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2003 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved