VOL. LIV, NO. 49
California State University, Long Beach November 24 , 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Jamie Oye
Assistant News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jack Scheneider
Assistant City Editor

Monica L. Pardee
Opinion Editor

Monica L. Clark
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jennifer Camacho
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Janet Gutierrez-Tostado
Floria Myung

Advertising Representatives

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Lego Hartanto
Production Staff

Carlo Dayrit
Justin Smith

Circulation Staff

 

. News  
 

Arnold reveals budget plans

SACRAMENTO (AP) — Voters in March should be asked to approve a carrot-and-stick approach to breaking the state’s cycle of enacting fat budgets in good times that can’t be sustained during economic downturns, Gov. Arnold Schwarz-enegger’s finance director told state lawmakers.

Schwarzenegger wants voters to increase the state’s long-term debt by $15 billion to cover much of the current budget deficit. That could cost taxpayers $30 billion over 30 years to pay back, and already is drawing objections from the new governor’s fellow constitutional officers as well as lawmakers.

In return, however, Schwarz-enegger proposes that voters simultaneously approve spending limits to avoid a repeat of the boom-bust spending cycle that has resulted in California’s record budget deficits.

Schwarzenegger wants to use the $15 billion mainly to replace about $13 billion worth of bonds approved by the Legislature in the current budget, but which are the subjects of court challenges. That includes about $2 billion in pension bonds struck down by a judge, and $10.7 billion in deficit finance bonds that are being challenged in court because they were passed by the Legislature, not voters through a statewide vote.

A bipartisan group of 11 Assembly members wants to limit appropriations to 97 percent of projected revenue, with the other 3 percent going to build a budgetary reserve fund, then to fund infrastructure improvements, with possible one-time school payments and sales tax rebates. Their proposal would limit spending growth using a formula based on increases in population and personal income.

A competing plan by Assemblyman John Campbell, R-Irvine, would peg growth to a formula based on population and inflation, which grows more slowly. His proposal would split excess revenue between a rainy day fund and debt retirement, with potential one-time income tax rebates.

It was the bond portion of Schwarzenegger’s proposal that drew criticism Wednesday from state lawmakers and Legislative Analyst Elizabeth Hill, as it has previously by Democratic Controller Steve Westly and Treasurer Phil Angelides.

The state already borrows too much, Hill told the committee, and Schwarzenegger’s plan continues to paper over the existing budget imbalance and would leave ‘‘future generations — my grandchildren for example’’ to pay for past spending.

Lawmakers have just until Dec. 5 if they are to put Schwarz-enegger’s plan on the March ballot, and their special session is to be interrupted by the long Thanksgiving holiday.
The Senate Budget Committee is expected to begin considering the bond plan Thursday.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2003 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved