VOL. LIV, NO. 37
California State University, Long Beach November 3 , 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Jamie Oye
Assistant News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jack Scheneider
Assistant City Editor

Monica L. Pardee
Opinion Editor

Monica L. Clark
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jennifer Camacho
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Janet Gutierrez-Tostado
Floria Myung

Advertising Representatives

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Lego Hartanto
Production Staff

Carlo Dayrit
Justin Smith

Circulation Staff

 

. News  
 

Armenian genocide debated by Senate

By Gerry Wachovsky
Daily Forty-Niner

For Shant Baboujian the Armenian genocide is not an event that should be relegated to the dust bin of history. Baboujian, with tears welling in his eyes, urged A.S.I. Senators last week to pass a genocide resolution denouncing the systematic murder of Armenians in the early 20th century.

After deliberating for weeks, the Senate has not come to an official conclusion regarding the future of the resolution brought forth by the Armenian Students Association. One reason for the Senate's delay in passing a resolution of this nature has stemmed from several Senate members' beliefs that it could possibly "open a can of worms." Baboujian said he does not see it this way.

"Look at this [genocide] as people who were massacred, led on death walks, and raped; this is a humanity issue, it is not only about Armenians," Baboujian said before the Senate. "I seriously don't think this will open up a can of worms."

Sen. Morgan Wheeler was one of the first to voice his hesitance in passing this resolution, saying that he had a problem with singling out the Armenian genocide because it would label the Turks as perpetrators and possibly anger the Turkish Student Association. He voiced approval of a more generic resolution, denouncing all genocide. Senator-at-large Daniel Rukhman disagreed with Wheeler and said "Going and denouncing all genocide is beyond our scope."

Baboujian clarified for Wheeler as well the rest of the Senate that the passage of the resolution would not single out the Turks, but rather the "Young Turk" government during the Ottoman Empire, the ruling body at the time the genocide occurred.

Sen.-at-large Erik Jolliff sided with Wheeler, saying that he agreed with the prior understanding that the Senate came to, that this resolution was to cover "genocide in general." Sen. Adam Sturgeon, on the other hand, agreed with Baboujian, as well as the rest of the Armenian students in attendance, and said, "I personally see no problem with this resolution; if other groups want to present resolutions then we will deal with them as well."

Sen.-at-large Rebekah Smith agreed, saying, "What matters to me most is that there are Armenian students here today who support this." Echoing these sentiments, Baboujian said that he did not see what the Senate was so "afraid of."

Ara Aprahamian, an Armenian student and member of the association, said that this is a "human and intellectual issue" and hoped that "this can act as a catalyst for similar student associations to tackle [similar] issues."

Wheeler, however, still objected.

"I cannot vote on something that will point out another group [the Turks], and possibly offend other students belonging to that group." He concluded by saying, "I truly do hate this atrocity and I am sorry that this has to be so disputed in politics."

Wrapping up the discussion, A.S.I. Vice President Guido Piotti said "this group [the Armenian Student Association] has been waiting a long time for this, and have done their homework and gone out of their way to [support this resolution]." The Senate then agreed to send the resolution back to Documents and Bylaws so it can be reworded and tightened up.

Before the meeting concluded, however, Sen. Wheeler voiced his disapproval of Vice President Piotti taking an opinion on the issue, and said that Piotti is simply supposed to serve as a deciding vote in ties and may have violated a bylaw by expressing his view.

Piotti commented after the meeting, "I was elected by almost 2,000 students to represent them in the Senate and for me to stay quiet on an issue that I feel is this important would be a failure of my duty." He also clarified that no bylaw had been violated.

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2003 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved