VOL. LIV, NO. 22
California State University, Long Beach October 7, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Jamie Oye
Assistant News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jack Scheneider
Assistant City Editor

Monica L. Pardee
Opinion Editor

Monica L. Clark
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jennifer Camacho
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Janet Gutierrez-Tostado
Floria Myung

Advertising Representatives

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Lego Hartanto
Production Staff

Carlo Dayrit
Justin Smith

Circulation Staff

 

. News  
 

Vehicle registration fee significant recall issue

By Angelika Meyer
Online Forty-Niner

One of the major issues up for debate in the recall election is the tripling of the vehicle registration fees.

"It's an unfair way of making taxpayers fix irresponsible politicians' budget mistakes," said Andreas Meyer, international relations major at the University of Southern California.

Many people have similar opinions of the vehicle registration fee increase, however, Gov. Gray Davis discussed the specifics of the legislation in an interview with Larry King, on CNN Sunday night, and explained how the vehicle registration fee goes to the counties.

Davis told King that in 1998 former Gov. Pete Wilson made an agreement with the counties. They agreed to reduce the vehicle registration fees by two-thirds and tohave this decrease in county money be replaced by checks written by the state from the general fund.

Wilson and county officials also agreed that if California was ever at a point where the state could not afford to pay the counties, the vehicle registration fees would increase to compensate. In a year the registration fee would be reviewed by the state legislature, and could be reduced again if deemed unnecessary.

Unfortunately, with the state deficit, Davis had to implement the vehicle registration fees as per the agreement made between Wilson and county officials in 1998. With the passage of the vehicle registration fee increase, it is estimated to cost each person approximately $158.

"This means that I won't be able to pay for other things, or I will have to take out a loan, or drop classes. But if it means I will remain safe with a high volume police force, then it is a sacrifice I am willing to make," said Diana Martinez, a senior in communication studies.

"Nobody wants to pay such high registration fees, however we need to pay this in order to have the police force and fire academy this money pays for," said David Bodnariuk, CSULB business management and marketing alumni.

However, the revenue created by the increased vehicle registration fee goes to the counties to pay for public safety, health care, foster care, and road maintenance.

"Without the increase, or a stable source of revenue to replace it, counties will have no choice but to lay off police, firefighters and support staff from that area." Clancy Faria, president of the Peace Officers' Research Association of California, told the Ventura County Star.

Considering this fee raise would generate $4.2 billion in one year, when asked whether there is an alternative for making this money, Martinez said, "Realistically no. I mean, we could cut the wages of the corporate CEOs, but that will never happen."

Meyer, had an opposing opinion and said, "There are tons of alternatives. For one, they could cut overlapping bureaucracies, and make California a more business-friendly state and thereby generate more revenue."

California's vehicle registration fee is generated off the price of a new car and averages two percent. While it is difficult to compare California's fee to other states because every state determines their fee in different ways, the two percent Californians will have to pay seems minimal to the four percent Arizona citizens pay.

Many people are taking the fee increase into considerations concerning the recall of Gov. Gray Davis.

When asked whether this legislation affected his decision to recall Davis, Bodnariuk said, "No. Why are we going to recall Davis for a Pete Wilson law?"

Meyer, while voting "Yes" on the recall, said "He should not be recalled just on the vehicle registration fee increase, but there are definitely other things he should be recalled for."

Many of the recall candidates said that the first thing they will do when elected governor is remove the registration fee, however, in a previously recorded statement with the Ventura County Star, Mike McGowan, County Supervisor, said, "It's an easy thing to say, but almost impossible to accomplish."

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

.... Governor-to-be faces daunting task
....
Graduation fees vary by each campus
....
Vehicle registration fee significant recall issue
....
News in a few
....
Meningitis causes concern in colleges
....
Half of middle-income Americans worry about finances

Opinion

.... Our View: Nature versus nurture on sex orientation a redundancy
.... The procrastinator's guide to the recall Election
.... Letter to the editor: Students should prevent mishaps

.... Onstage suicide as an artistic expression
.... Comic Strip

 

Diversions

.... MFA students choreograph new works
....
CSULB film grad shows skills with 'Debut'
.... Film review: Coppola back with poignant, funny 'Lost in Translation' starring Murray, Johansson
.... BOOK review: 'Postcards' combine tragedy, emotions tenderly
.... Sub-culture bands promote new music genre

 

Sports

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2003 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved