Online Forty-Niner: Summer 2002: Opinion
Online 49er Flag
. ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
NEWS | OPINION | DIVERSIONS | SPORTS | CLASSIFIEDS
POLLS | BULLETIN BOARD | SHOP | CALENDAR
.
VOL. IX, NO. 125
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH
June 20, 2002


ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

CLASSIFIEDS CLICK HERE

  • Jobs
  • Housing
  • Announcements


POLLS
BULLETIN BOARD
DAILY 49ER E-SHOP


ONLINE 49ER
DEPARTMENTS

ADVERTISING
ADMINISTRATION
DAILY 49ER ALUMNI
SUBSCRIPTIONS


GIVE FEEDBACK

Editorial Staff

Ken Hanson
Editor in Chief

Greg Smith
News Editor

Heather Clarke
City Editor

Sarah Davis
Diversions Editor

Joe Licovoli
Sports Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Edmond Ngai
Assistant Webmaster

opinion: our view

Scholarships needed for all


The rising cost of tuition at college campuses is an issue that we all face.
 
Students around the country have all tried the same methods to address this issue. We work full or part time, rely on our parents and apply for grants, loans and scholarships.
 
The problem many students from lower-income families are facing is the fact that many scholarships are moving away from a financial need basis to achievement based decisions, according to a recent article in the Los Angeles Times.
 
In a perfect world, any student who desires a college education would have access to that education. We do not live in a perfect world and many students need additional assistance.
 
The federal government offers Pell grants to students from low-income households and the state of California offers Cal grants to students who do not receive federal financial aide. But middle class families are looking for assistance to cover the rising cost of education because their annual income is too high to qualify for state and federal grants.
 
The push has created a new era of achievement-based scholarships, the Times reported.
 
Now students may earn scholarships based on performance rather than the level of financial need, which has caused concern among some educators that colleges and universities will no longer offer economic advancement for students from low-income neighborhoods.
 
Scholastic achievements are primarily based on standardized test scores, said the Times. Standardized tests have come under fire recently for being unfair to students who do not come from affluent families.
 
This may not be the best way to score a student’s scholastic achievements, but colleges and universities have an obligation not only to low-income, disadvantaged students, but also to all students to offer a top quality education so society can progress.
 
Why should we offer the benefits of higher education to less affluent students only because they are less affluent? The nations higher-learning institutions should be recruiting the best and brightest students from around the nation. That is what will keep America on the progressive track.
 
Donald E. Heller, a senior research associate at the Center for the Study of Higher Education at Pennsylvania State University, said his research found that about one-fifth of scholarships and grants from the nations universities and colleges were awarded to students supported by families with incomes of more than $100 thousand. The research also found that the same number of grants and scholarships were awarded to low-income students.
 
So how is it that the need-driven program gives more opportunity to disadvantaged students? According to the Times, it seems that moving towards achievement-based awards is helping an unseen portion of students. How many students at Cal State Long Beach do we know that complain that they have to work 30 to 40 hours a week to afford tuition because their parents make too much money to receive financial aide, but still cannot afford the cost of tuition?
 
Awarding scholarships based on merit is the best way to send the outstanding students to the college and university level. Perhaps scholarship money should be divided up and based on location, giving awards to outstanding students from various school districts without comparing economic backgrounds outside of those districts.
 
For example, if CSULB were to have $100,000 to award in scholarships, we give $25,000 to Long Beach high schools, $25,000 to Beverly Hills high schools, $25,000 to Orange county high schools and $25,0000 to out of state schools, the money would be evenly distributed and each applicant may be reviewed on scholastic merit as it applies within his or her school. Students would be compared to their peers rather than to other schools where better facilities may or may not be available.
 
The bottom line is that students should not be given money for college education just because they cannot afford it. Is it fair for a student who has outstanding achievements to not receive a scholarship because another student who has not performed as well was awarded the scholarship because his family is economically disadvantaged?


filler

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT


Search our site




DEPARTMENT OF
JOURNALISM


ONLINE 49ER

DEPARTMENTS

ADVERTISING
ADMINISTRATION
DAILY 49ER ALUMNI
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE


GIVE FEEDBACK


news

opinion

diversions

sports


ADVERTISEMENT

House Ads

ADVERTISEMENT


©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved