VOL. X, NO. 9
California State University, Long Beach September 16, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Our view

Unfair provision denies aid


The Drug-Free Student Aid provision to the Higher Education Act, passed by Congress in 1998, states that students who have drug convictions cannot receive financial aid for a specified amount of time following the conviction.
 
According to a report released by the Department of Education, the provision will ensure that more than 30,000 college students will not receive student aid for the 2002-2003 school year.
 
This provision has been thoroughly discussed and criticized over the past four years, with no changes to speak of. It is time that something changes. The Drug-Free Student Aid provision must be repealed, or at least amended.
 
The stench of discrimination and inequity seeps from the foundation of this act.
 
The provision unfairly discriminates against less financially stable families and students.
 
Logically, if a student who has ample financial means is convicted of a drug related offense, he or she does not need student aid anyway so there is no need to worry about not being able to afford college. However, if a student who is not as financially stable is convicted of a drug related offense, then he or she will struggle to achieve the needed funds to afford college, and ultimately may not be able to afford it at all.
 
A student with a past drug conviction who is not allowed the means necessary to attend college, and thus is forced into a life of manual labor or minimum wage jobs, will be far more likely to turn to drugs once again then a student who was given the opportunity to attend college.
 
What is this Drug-Free Student Aid provision trying to accomplish?
 
In a U-Wire article written by Melissa Kronfeld from the Washington, D.C. Bureau, Rep. Mark Souder, R-Ind., states that, “the measure was originally enacted to cut federal funding to those students who received drug convictions while already receiving aid.”
 
If the provision were originally enacted for this stated reason, then why is it actually working to deny financial aid to students who have past convictions?
 
The provision makes it more difficult for students with past convictions to move on with their lives and better themselves, which is obviously what they are attempting to do by trying to attend college in the first place.
 
The Drug-Free Student Aid provision of the Higher Education Act is a down right discriminatory and unfair measure that must be reformed to ensure equal opportunities to all students regardless of how colorful their past may be.




Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Unfair provision denies aid

Diversions

.... Art exhibit brings dash of culture

.... Inland Invasion infuses bad performances

.... East Village presents artists

Sports

.... USC, USD no match for Beach

.... Soccer ties OSU at home

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved