VOL. X, NO. 39
California State University, Long Beach November 6, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Our view

Non-lethal weapons needed

About a week ago120 hostages died when Russian forces used incapacitating gas to gain control of a group of Chechen separatists who had taken a theatre with 750 people hostage. Russian officials said that the gas was not supposed to be fatal.

In light of the deaths of the 120 hostages, the National Research Council urged the Navy and Marine Corps to focus more on the development of non-lethal weapons to control crowds and provide and protect security for military bases on Monday.

As of now, non-lethal weapons like bad smelling chemicals, or psychological methods such as playing calming music during riots or speaking to people in their own language have not been studied adequately.

The National Research Council recommended that the Defense Department's Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate put more priority on exploring new ideas and improving the ability to study non-lethal weapons' effectiveness.

The council also recommended that the department establish centers to study non-lethal weapons effect on people and equipment, establish an approval process, establish a working group to actively manage non-lethal weapons development and increase non-lethal weapons research and development in general.

However, as reasonable as these recommendations are, non-lethal weapons programs do have their critics. Critics said that the Research Council's report is irresponsible and dangerous because it will be used by the Pentagon to increase their chemical weapons development efforts resulting in potential disaster for arms control. Critics also argue that the report could cause a destabilization of controls on chemical weapons.

Regardless of what critics say, the study and development of non-lethal weaponry is necessary to insure that innocent people are not made into victims during crowd controlling or other situations. Contrary to what critics argue, there is nothing to lose when increasing non-lethal weapons research.

The U.S. military is already researching the possibility of using drugs such as Valium in spray form to calm crowds. Tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades are some non-fatal weapons that are already being used by the military. No disasters have occurred as of yet due to the use of these methods.

Research for non-lethal weaponry should continue and increase. The National Research Council's recommendations should be followed. There is no valid reason not to take all measures possible to reduce the number of fatalities in any crowd-controlling situation.


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Non-lethal weapons needed

 

Diversions

.... Professor writes series of inspirational books

.... Moscow Ballet modernizes ‘The Nutcracker'

 

Sports

.... Beach saves its best for 49er Classic

.... Ice hockey team has fresh, new face on roster

.... LBSU Intramural sports scoreboard -- Week of Oct. 28-Nov. 1

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved