VOL. X, NO. 36
California State University, Long Beach October 31, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Why does voter apathy exist?


What if there were an election and nobody came? Right now California is headed in that direction, judging from voting statistics. More than 21 million potential voters are in this state, but in March only slightly more than 5 million were motivated enough to cast a ballot. That’s fewer than 25 percent, an all-time low.
 
At this rate it’s a good bet that November’s general election participation rate will be below 40 percent. That would set an apathy record too. Most commentators seem to think that low voter turnout is a bad thing and that it is an indictment of those who could register but choose not to, and those who could vote but do not.
 
In this particular election cycle, commentators also point fingers at the uninspiring personas of the major party candidates for governor and their excessive use of negative campaigning.
 
But also consider the evidence that the California election system is badly out of order. First, our state’s districts have more people than districts elsewhere. State Assembly members represent more than 400,000 constituents. State Senate districts are twice that size.
 
So, the typical voter is simply a target for mail, and not somebody who knows or is known by those who are running. In statewide races, the candidates are television personalities (or non-personalities in the case of Simon and Davis). Virtual campaigns make it hard to form a personal connection to the candidates.
 
Point in case: This fall, Davis is spending a record $3 million a week on television ads in an election likely to have a record low turnout.
 
Then there’s gerrymandering. Thanks to a conspiracy of Republican and Democratic party insiders, most legislative districts this time around are “safe” for a particular party or individual. Only about nine of 153 seats are even slightly competitive, and just one of these is a congressional seat.
 
Long Beach is in a “no contest” zone. Because of gerrymandering, the key election was the March primary. You missed it? Too bad! No matter how you vote this November, the guys and gals in the back room have already largely decided the election. So why bother casting a ballot? Well, some very important ballot measures await your attention.
 
Please keep paying attention: The 2004 primary will be here sooner than you think.

— Paul C. Schmidt,
department of political science


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Halloween forgets children

.... Union of nature and nurture

.... Letter to the editor

.... How do you feel about campus security?

.... Why does voter apathy exist?

 

Diversions

.... Nugget to throw big bash today

.... Drivethru Jesus captivates listeners in Student Union

.... 'Mame’ to open at Carpenter Center

.... Weekend calendar

 

Sports

.... LBSU looks to reclaim its winning ways

.... LBSU Intramural sports scoreboard — Week of Oct. 21-25

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved