VOL. X, NO. 32
California State University, Long Beach October 24, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Our view

Prop. 51 improves roads


Yet another measure on this year’s ballot involves the redistribution of existing revenues from General Fund to Trust Fund for highway and school bus safety, transportation and environmental programs.
 
Proposition 51 will allow 30 percent of the General Fund revenues, which come from the sales tax on the lease and sale of motor vehicles, to be solely used for state and local transportation-related purposes rather than being available for programs funded by the General Fund.
 
Supporters of the measure argue that the proposition is necessary to improve California’s roads, relieve traffic problems, provide safer routes for children walking to and from school, reduce oil and gas pollution, prevent bridges from being damaged by earthquakes and to improve public transit.
 
Not surprisingly, opponents to the measure, mainly the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, California Taxpayers Association and the National Tax Limitation Committee, once again argue that although the measure’s objectives are honorable, it will increase ongoing budget deficits and thus is an unwise proposition.
 
However, as argued by supporters of the measure, it will not raise taxes because it dedicates existing sales taxes to immediate road and highway safety improvements along with other projects.
 
The safety of California’s roadways is vital to the state and should be prioritized as such. Currently, many of California’s roadways are in a less than satisfactory condition and something must be done immediately to improve their conditions. Proposition 51 proposes to do just that. On the contrary, those who oppose the proposition offer no suggestions concerning improvements to California’s roads.
 
Among the supporters of Proposition 51 are the California Organization of Police and Sheriffs, School Transportation Coalition, Partners for Highway Safety, California Safe Kids Network and the American Lung Association of California.
 
With the measure being backed by such organizations, it is evident that it is not just a “pay to play” scheme as the opposition calls it.
 
Allocating 30 percent of existing revenues from motor vehicle sales and leases from General Fund to Trust Fund ensures that issues such as the maintenance of California’s roadways, replacement of school buses for increased safety, relief of traffic congestion, providing for cleaner water and air and safer school routes for children are given the priority they warrant.
 
A no vote on Proposition 51 would do nothing to fix any of these problems currently being faced by California.


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Prop. 51 improves roads

.... Controversial nature of war

.... Letter to the editor

 

Diversions

.... Drum circle pounds beat of traditional music

.... Halloween is time of year to get groove on

.... Knott’s is monstrous this time of year

.... Weekend Calendar

 

Sports

.... LBSU looks to avenge loss against Gauchos

.... LBSU Intramural sports scoreboard — Week of Oct. 14-18

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved