VOL. X, NO. 28
California State University, Long Beach October 17, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Our view

California needs Prop. 50


As California’s population continues to grow the importance of the quality, safety, availability and protection of its water also increases.

Proposition 50 is an important measure that aims to protect these necessities. The proposition would authorize funding to improve security for water systems, remove harmful pollutants from drinking water, create water efficiency projects, reduce Colorado River water use, and most importantly allow for the purchasing, protecting and restoring of coastal wetlands near urban areas.

Opponents to the measure argue that it is much too costly at $3.44 billion, and because the proposition will not create new water storage and distribution facilities, it is simply not worth the price. Those against the measure also argue that all it will do is hand out money to fund projects of environmental extremist groups.

Organizations and individuals against Proposition 50 make a weak, insufficient argument.

They complain about the amount of money it will cost, but if they had their way, they would be building more dams and facilities that would cost the same amount if not more than Proposition 50.

Reasons for their opposition ultimately boil down to the allotment of money toward organizations and causes that they have no interest in. However, just because opponents would rather solve the water problems in California by building a few dams here and there, this does not mean that Proposition 50 cannot also solve, or at least alleviate water problems without building dams and new water facilities.

Proposition 50 will use existing tax revenue to fix sewer and storm water systems that, over time, have begun to dump raw sewage and other pollution into coastal waters, making them unsafe for swimming. California prides itself on its beautiful beaches; the pride of California should be continuously protected.

The measure will also increase security for California’s reservoirs, dams and other facilities, which are currently only surrounded by fences. In the wake of recent terrorist attacks, the protection and security of drinking water should not be overlooked or taken lightly.

Proposition 50 proposes to solve real problems involving water in California, an extremely important issue that affects every Californian’s life. The fact is, if the measure passes, it will work toward improving and protecting what we already have. If it does not pass, the safety of our drinking water and the protection of coastal wetlands will be at stake.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... California needs Prop. 50

.... Bush’s politics interfere with policy

.... Letters to the Editor

.... Missiles go unnoticed

 

Diversions

.... Professionalism shines in show

.... Ghost Ship in need of another ocean to sail on

.... Weekend Calendar

.... Latin museum celebrates the dead on Sundays

 

Sports

.... Men’s golf faces tough field, takes 15th

.... LBSU student-athlete grad rates drop

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved