VOL. X, NO. 27
California State University, Long Beach October 16, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Our view

Prop. 52 needs slight change


With Election Day rapidly approaching, the debates about the different propositions are heating up with proponents and opponents, each getting their last desperate shots in to win as many votes as possible for their cause.
 
Proposition 52 is one of the propositions that many people expect will pass quite easily. However, like everything else, this proposition also has its opponents.
 
The measure would allow citizens to register to vote as late as Election Day with valid identification. The proposition would also increase criminal election fraud fines and make it a felony, punishable by state prison time, to conspire to commit election fraud.
 
Proposition 52, which was introduced by lobbyist Vigo G. Nielsen and Lance Olson, a Republican and a Democrat respectively, aims to increase voter participation without costing an excessive amount of money.
 
The main fear concerning the measure is that it will compromise the fairness of voting in California by making it too easy for non-citizens and felons to vote because the law’s identification requirements are not strict enough.
 
Another argument against the measure is that it would leave no time to investigate suspicious registrations because ballots from previously registered individuals would be mixed in with those ballots from people who registered on the Election Day, making it virtually impossible for law enforcement to prove any voter fraud occurred.
 
Although opponents of Proposition 52 have a valid reason to argue against the passage of the measure, proponents also have a strong argument in support of it.
 
The measure will change current law that requires no form of identification to a law that at least requires some form of identification. And, as demonstrated in states that already have same day voter registration, voter turnout will be greatly increased.
 
Any measure that increases the amount of people who vote is important to the advancement of the voting process. However, opponents do raise a point in their fear of voter fraud. Perhaps if stronger measures were taken to prevent or make voter fraud more difficult, while still allowing at least close to Election Day registration, the proposition would not be so bitterly debated.
 
Proposition 52 is based upon the positive idea and cause of increasing voter participation, but as it is, it does not provide the proper and necessary safeguards against voter fraud.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Prop. 52 needs slight change

.... Journalists must back down

.... Teacher should leave CSULB

 

Diversions

.... ‘Blue Room’ brimming with humor

.... Oktoberfest beer drinkers utopia

 

Sports

.... 49ers men’s golf claims 15th in Fresno

.... LBSU Intramural sports scoreboard — Week of Oct. 7-11

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved