VOL. X, NO. 24
California State University, Long Beach October 10, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Philosophy and human life


Barlas F. Esin - Unsystematic Ideas

In our highly advanced society, where efficiency and results have more cash-value than reflection and contemplation, many people have come to consider philosophy - the love of wisdom or knowledge - as a useless endeavor. Since scientific enterprise began forming determinate axioms and formulas about the nature of reality, philosophy’s search for meanings, rather than results, has declined in popularity. “Do we still need philosophy?” is a question in people’s minds.
 
As humans, we have no extraordinary physiological qualities that place us high on the food chain. So, why are there so many of us: Lions, bears and other powerful predators should have eaten all of us a long time ago. We are still around because we, unlike animals, have the mind power that allows us to think critically and creatively. Philosophy, therefore, is solely reserved for our usage. “Everything human is human,” Hegel rightly held, “because it is brought about through thinking, and for that reason alone.”
 
It’s true that philosophy is not like various branches of sciences, such as physics, biology or mathematics. Philosophy, for example, cannot warrant such clear conclusions as: Four plus four is eight. The world, however, is full of countless entities. Without the ability to generalize and conceptualize, we would waste all of our time trying to grasp the basics. Life, as we know it, would be impossible. We need philosophy to form plausible notions of the world - and beyond.
 
“Philosophy,” Ludwig Wittgenstein once said, “leaves everything as it is.” His claim, however, was not necessarily true. We have always been eager for - and are often moved by - new theories about existence: Why and how we came to be and where we are going. Throughout the ages, in fact, philosophers from Plato through Descartes to Kant and Nietzsche never left things as they were. Earlier philosophers shaped our world - some even revolutionizing it - through their social and political writings.
 
Socrates pointed out the consequence of avoiding philosophy when he remarked, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” We have no choice about the fact that we need philosophy. Our only choice is whether we define our philosophy by a conscious, rational and rigorous process of thought or let our subliminal mind generate false assumptions, groundless beliefs and superfluous conclusions.
 
The only tool necessary for philosophizing - other than curiosity - is reason, whose fundamental objective is clarity. The use of vague notions, fuzzy feelings or instincts is not reason. Reason specifically requires clear and identifiable building blocks, meaning that it rejects any conclusion that doesn’t follow from logical premises. In this sense, reason is organized, systematic and purposeful.
 
The truth is simple: Every person has an understanding of the world, therefore - either implicitly or explicitly - every person must have a philosophy. Philosophy is not some mysterious inquiry important only to ancient men in white robes. It supplies the means by which we can gain knowledge and use it to support our lives. It allows us to correct errors and contradictions, so that we can start thinking in concepts rather than in concretes.
 
I, for my part, try to approach analysis of events and situations from a more philosophical standpoint, rather than a political one. My motive behind utilizing philosophy as a means of communication is not to confuse, but to simply offer a fresh method to writing while encouraging a different way of looking at things. What is most challenging, after all, is not to have an opinion about anything, but to be able to support that opinion with sound reasoning.
 
College life signifies higher learning, which - unlike what the status quo believes - should be more than merely learning for survival and success. In my opinion, higher learning should involve learning through a “conscious” process of thinking, where one integrates an explicit philosophy into his or her own life.
 
Therefore, instead of taking things for granted, as our society encourages these days, isn’t it more worthwhile to think of meanings and values behind things? When we collectively do this in a conscious way, we will realize once again the importance of philosophy in human life.
 
Barlas F. Esin is a senior journalism major with a minor in philosophy he can be contacted by e-mail at besin@csulb.edu.


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Bush manipulates emotions

.... Philosophy and human life

.... Letter to the Editor

 

Forum

.... CFA, CSU discuss tenure-track faculty

.... Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 73 and Task Force Report

.... Funding key to hire permanent faculty

 

Diversions

.... Author, poet hosts event tonight

.... Dance company to perform hula for Long Beach

.... Weekend Calendar

.... Porn ’n Chicken encompasses poor cliches

Sports

.... LBSU manager has big hoop dreams

.... Phillips’ return boosts 49ers title hopes

.... Golfer undergoes surgery

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved