VOL. X, NO. 24
California State University, Long Beach October 10, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Funding key to hire permanent faculty


By David S. Spence, CSU Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Academic Officer
 

If the California State University system is going to sustain high-quality education for its more than 400,000 students, including 33,000 at Cal State Long Beach, then we must continue to recruit first-class faculty members to teach these students. The state budget provides the basic resources to hire new faculty as vacancies occur and to meet funded enrollment growth. Changing the permanent to part-time faculty mix will require additional resources. In this difficult budgetary climate, reduced funding is a key challenge we must all face together.
 
The CSU, the statewide Academic Senate and the California Faculty Association have agreed to a plan that will mean more permanent faculty and fewer lecturers on campuses. If funded by the legislature and governor, the eight-year plan will enable the CSU to increase the number of tenured and tenure-track faculty to 75 percent of the total faculty, up from the current 63 percent.
 
The CSU’s current budget is still in flux, with the governor slated to make at least $750 million in cuts before the end of the year to various state operations, possibly including the CSU and its 23 campuses.
 
This year’s uncertainty has a bearing on next year’s planning. The CSU Board of Trustees will finalize its 2003-2004 budget request at an Oct. 31 meeting. Besides requesting funds for enrollment growth, we are asking for $35.6 million in additional funds to begin the process of hiring these additional permanent faculty. Over the eight years, it is expected to cost an additional $101 million to recruit and hire the new faculty called for in our ACR73 plan. While we are fully supportive of the plan, the state’s budget woes are a sobering reality with which we must collectively deal.
 
Currently, about 63 percent of the full-time equivalent faculty in the CSU are tenured or on a tenure-track, meaning that they are permanent employees. The rest are primarily lecturers, most of whom are employed on a part-time basis. In 2001-2002, there were 10,029 tenure/tenure-track FTE faculty, and 5,693 FTE lecturer faculty. By the end of the eight years, if funding materializes, there will be 16,854 tenure-track faculty and 5,618 lecturers.
 
The CSU absolutely believes that it is important to achieve an appropriate balance between tenured/tenure-track faculty and lecturer faculty for the benefit of our students. We also believe it is the joint responsibility of the CSU, the faculty and the state to make the case for the funding that will allow us to attain that balance.
 
To achieve the goal of the ACR73 plan in eight years, the CSU must conduct between 1,800 and 2,000 annual faculty searches. About 75 percent of all searches result in an accepted offer, which means we expect to add about 900 new faculty this year.
 
Even with the uncertainty surrounding the state budget, the CSU, the CFA and the Academic Senate believe that adding funds for new permanent faculty is an investment in the future of the CSU’s educational quality. Everything we do must be in the best interests of students, and this plan certainly is. Starting now and for as long as it takes for the state’s budget picture to begin
to brighten, we must all work for the resources needed to attract these new faculty to the California State University to teach our first-class student body.




During the last two years, at several California State University system campuses, the California Faculty Association held a series of teach-ins on the future of the university.  As a result of the hearings and discussions, the CFA presented a bill to the State legislature that would increase the percentage of full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty in the CSU system.
 
In September 2001, the California Legislature adopted that bill, ACR 73. In a ground-breaking undertaking to implement ACR-73, the California Faculty Association, the California State University Administration and the statewide Academic Senate collaborated successfully and developed a plan to increase tenure-track faculty appointments from the current level of 64 percent to 75 percent of tull-time equivalent faculty positions, over an eight-year period.  “The Plan to Increase the Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in the California State University” reverses the trend that has dominated hiring in the CSU, and nationally, for the past two decades. The project and the plan can be a model for educational institutions nationwide.
 
The new plan is good for students because tenure-track faculty are full-time employees, responsible for student advising, have a long-term commitment to the institution, and are often engaged in research projects and creative activities that involve students.  Students will have more and diversified access to their teachers.  The plan is good for the university because full-time tenure-track faculty are the ones responsible for program development, curriculum revision, and who participate in governance.
 
The plan is good for all new tenure-track hires because they are eligible for tenure, which is the sole guarantee of academic freedom.  This allows teachers to treat and discuss controversial subject matter, important in a strong liberal education.   The plan is good for lecturer faculty because they will not lose their current positions, and they will be considered for appropriate tenure-track positions when they are qualified.
 
The CFA, the CSU and the Academic Senate share the goal of bettering the quality of education for the students in the largest public education system in the country.  Therefore, all three parties are hailing the plan and ACR 73.

— Martin Fiebert
chapter president, CFA



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Bush manipulates emotions

.... Philosophy and human life

.... Letter to the Editor

 

Forum

.... CFA, CSU discuss tenure-track faculty

.... Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 73 and Task Force Report

.... Funding key to hire permanent faculty

 

Diversions

.... Author, poet hosts event tonight

.... Dance company to perform hula for Long Beach

.... Weekend Calendar

.... Porn ’n Chicken encompasses poor cliches

Sports

.... LBSU manager has big hoop dreams

.... Phillips’ return boosts 49ers title hopes

.... Golfer undergoes surgery

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved