VOL. X, NO. 20
California State University, Long Beach October 3, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Our view

Preemptive action not wise


The question of whether the United States will go to war against Iraq has been continuously in the news for the past year with many changes occurring, but war has not yet been declared.
 
In June, President Bush proposed that Americans not wait to be attacked, but rather be ready to take “preemptive action” to protect ourselves against the threat of Saddam Hussein’s weapons.
 
Proponents of going to war with Iraq, and using “preemptive action,” believe that America has already waited too long, and given Hussein too many chances. Many see Hussein’s initial restriction of the weapons inspectors as a convincing enough reason to distrust him and head to war.
 
A resolution agreed upon Wednesday gives Bush expansive power to use military force to “defend the national security interests of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq,” and to “enforce all relevant U.N. Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq” as he sees fit.
 
Bush’s promise to deal with Hussein diplomatically, if possible, but militarily if necessary, is clearly a meaningless pledge. His purpose is to convince Americans that all that can be done has been done to avoid war. If Bush succeeds in convincing at least a majority of the nation of this, then he will possibly avoid some of the criticism against him that will follow a war against Iraq.
 
Ultimately, a “preemptive” war with Iraq would not be in our nation’s best interests.
 
Hussein is seen as an undisputed menace throughout most of the world. However, the fact that practically no one else in the world supports America in going to war with Iraq should tell us something.
 
Furthermore, as the Associated Press reported, a full-scale war with Iraq would cost up to $9 billion a month not including the billions of dollars it would cost to bring military troops back home.
 
If America succeeded in conquering Hussein and removing him from Iraq, we would then have to occupy and govern the country for who knows how long. Leading to yet another costly undertaking.
 
And still there is the argument that Bush desires to wage war against Iraq merely to finish what his father started, to seek revenge and punish Hussein for the Gulf War.
 
An examination of the issues surrounding the question of going to war with Iraq leads to the conclusion that “preemptive action” is not going to solve any problems but will only create more, put us into debt and possibly cause a loss of the support of European and Middle Eastern countries.
 
The consequences of a war with Iraq are too high.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Preemptive action not wise

.... Greeks not upholding values

.... Forum touts First Amendment

Diversions

.... Author combines art with mystery

.... Musical Theatre celebrates 50 years

.... Weekend calendar

 

Sports

.... Women’s soccer shut out by Aztecs

.... 49ers face easy Big West foes this weekend


ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved