VOL. X, NO. 2
California State University, Long Beach September 3, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

User privacy reigns supreme


Internet companies currently know this information. Sound like science fiction? Don’t you wish. Like “Minority Report,” online advertisers have been able to customize customer profiles. DoubleClick, an online marketing advertiser, had been using “cookies,” or electronic tags, to track consumer’s names and surfing habits. The company had known where you went and what you did on the Web. As of last week, the practice was discontinued in the form of a settlement.
 
Sure, you might ask, what’s the big deal? So what if companies can tailor advertisements to your wants and needs? I see it like this. Telemarketers have become an unavoidable nuisance. Even if they call with something of interest, it’s still annoying to know that the company received your number from that card you filled out to win a new car. Or, that registry you filled out at the mall. Gee, you spend an awful lot of time at the mall, don’t you?
 
But, the problem is with DoubleClick’s methods. Unlike the mall, the company didn’t ask for the Web visitor’s permission. While surfing the Net, the company would insert a file known as a cookie to track what the user does and where the user goes on the Web. With this information, the company would shows ads that are suitable for you.
 
Yes, the ad will display something I’m interested in; let’s say Warcraft III. But, once again, the problem is permission. The Web site never asked me if I wanted a cookie tailoring ads to me.
 
On the positive side, it appears the question of permission will change. Under the settlement, Web sites using DoubleClick must disclose the company’s activities in the privacy policy. And, the ad provider cannot use data collected on a client without client’s permission. DoubleClick isn’t sitting idly by either. The advertising company is working on a cookie viewer that allows the surfer to see the interest categories the company uses.
 
True, no one ever looks at a site’s privacy policy. And, hardly anyone knows what a “cookie” is. But, advertisers are making key first steps to avoid exploiting consumers for not protecting themselves.
 
Of course, even with the warnings, there’s always a fear the company could sell information to a telemarketer.
 
So, would you like to get some vinyl-plated sidings?



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

news

Opinion

.... Ban on soda equals lost profit

.... User privacy reigns supreme

Diversions

.... Festival cures the blues

.... Art of ‘Happiness’ anything but happy

Sports

.... LBSU picked to win

.... Redshirt freshman leaves basketball team

.... A day with softball pitcher Meredith Cervenka

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved