VOL. X, NO. 2
California State University, Long Beach September 3, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Our view

Ban on soda equals lost profit


Amid all the petty or maybe not so petty things that we as college students have to complain about, now we have something to be thankful for. We should all give thanks to the gods of the carbonated beverages that we still maintain our right to drink soda whenever we please. For this much cannot be said for the unfortunate students within the Los Angeles Unified School District.
 
That’s right, in an effort to curb obesity among youths, the sale of all carbonated drinks during school hours is to be banned in the LAUSD.
 
Approximately 748,000 elementary through high school students can no longer enjoy that afternoon pick-me-up that used to get them through fifth and sixth period. Students will now have to wash down their candy bars, donuts, cupcakes, cookies, pizza, French fries and deep fried hot lunches with a healthier alternative such as milk, water or juice.
 
That should do the trick.
 
One glance at a school menu will tell you that the problem of obesity will not be curbed by the absence of soda on campus. The only number that’s going to significantly decrease is the amount of school profit derived from the sale of sodas. And for what, the pretense of a healthier, more nourishing lunch menu?
 
Perhaps if the school eliminated all of the deep fried, frosted and processed unhealthy foods from it’s menu, sold only carrots and tofu, and set up a bunch of running wheels, (like those for mice, only bigger) and made students run in them for 50 minutes everyday, we might begin to see a decrease in obesity. But we would most definitely also see a sharp increase in the levels of truancy.
 
But no, obesity is the fault of the soda companies. Forget about the endless hours students spend every week watching television, playing video games or sitting at a computer, and don’t mention the ever diminishing amount of family time available for sitting down at a dinner table to eat a well-balanced meal. Now most meals are on the go, if not pre-prepared frozen dinners, take-out or fast food. But, let’s not worry about all that and just point the finger at the soda companies. It’s their fault.
 
Apart from the health aspect of the soda ban there is another issue that should be addressed.
 
Great deals of the “children” who will be affected by the soda ban are high school students. These students get themselves out of bed in the morning, dress themselves, drive, ride or walk to school, go to class, do homework, many of them even have jobs. If they are responsible enough to do these things, then it is evident that they should be allowed to decide if they would like to drink a beverage that may not be the healthiest for them. They are faced with more difficult and life altering decisions everyday.
 
In school and outside of school these students are constantly told to act mature and be responsible; they are admonished for acting like children. It is an observed fact that people, especially young people, act in a way that matches how they are treated. If they were treated as though they were intelligent and worthy of praise, they will feel and act intelligent and worthy of praise. In the same way, if the students are treated as if they were little children incapable of making their own beverage decisions, then they will act as such.
 
Also, lets not forget that the nature of the teen-ager is to buck the system. If teen-agers want soda at school, they’re going to get it.
 
Some of the more enterprising individuals will probably even start up their own businesses selling Pepsi straight out of their backpacks at $2 a can. All they have to do is pick up a 24-pack at the liquor store on the corner before school, pass around a few notes and whispers before lunch to circulate the news that the goods are in, and if they sell out, that’s $48 in the pocket. Not a bad day’s work, and what a profit margin.
 
No one is saying that soda is beneficial to the body. Ok, so it’s somewhat unhealthy, but so are many of the other food items sold in schools that the average student consumes in a day. People should not go around banning perfectly legal foods in schools just because they may be unhealthy.
 
The benefits of LAUSD’s ban on carbonated beverages are not worth the amount of profit that the school will loose in lieu of the new policy. The ban may even have adverse effects that no one took into account during the planning and passing of this worthless motion.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

news

Opinion

.... Ban on soda equals lost profit

.... User privacy reigns supreme

Diversions

.... Festival cures the blues

.... Art of ‘Happiness’ anything but happy

Sports

.... LBSU picked to win

.... Redshirt freshman leaves basketball team

.... A day with softball pitcher Meredith Cervenka

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved