VOL. X, NO. 17
California State University, Long Beach September 30, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Our view

Big tobacco’s appeal inane


Three-hundred thousand to 700,000 sick Florida smokers still have not received any of the $145 billion in punitive damages that was awarded to them in July 2000.

Judging by the actions of the cigarette firms, the Florida smokers will not be receiving any of that money anytime soon, or not at all if the cigarette manufacturers achieve their goal.

Four of the United States’ five largest cigarette firms Wednesday filed the final documents in their appeal of the $145 billion award. The fifth largest manufacturer, Liggett Group, is expected to file its appeal within the week.

The five tobacco companies’ lawyers will soon begin their arguments to nullify the record award and more importantly, remove class-action status from the lawsuit, eliminating the possibility of a retrial.

The firms are basing their appeal on court decisions that smokers’ claims are no longer suitable for class-action treatment because the claims are so varied with their own individual characteristics.

Unfortunately, because of the court decisions regarding class-action lawsuits, the $145 billion award is expected to be overturned and the tobacco industry will once again get away with murder.

The most disturbing part of this case is that those 300,000 to 700,000 people actually believed that they won their case and now, not only are they sick and dying, but their perceived victory will probably be ripped right out from underneath them because of some recent tobacco industry-engineered technicality.

The right to appeal is necessary and does serve a purpose within the court system. However, in this situation that right is being exploited.

The tobacco companies originally lost their case because the jury determined that their product was unreasonably dangerous, deadly, and that the companies made statements with the intention of misleading smokers.

Those truths still stand. If the award is to be overturned it should be done so because those things have been found inaccurate. They have not.

The court overseeing the appeal should recognize this last ditch effort by the tobacco companies as being based on a questionable technicality.

Even if each claim has its unique attributes, they all have at least one similarity — the quality of life was damaged and the smokers were misled. The companies lost based on those facts, and they should have to pay based on those facts.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Big tobacco’s appeal inane

Diversions

.... Artists delve into cafe delicacies

.... Roberta Flack still sophisticated

 

Sports

.... Gauchos go the distance, top LBSU

.... Mexico edges 49ers


ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved