VOL. X, NO. 15
California State University, Long Beach September 25, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Our view

Davis repeal invites litigation


For the past two decades a shield law has protected gun manufactures from lawsuits regarding gun design, distribution and marketing.

This week Gov. Gray Davis is expected to sign Assembly Bill 496 and Senate Bill 682, two almost identical bills that will overturn the 1983 California Supreme Court ruling removing any special immunity enjoyed by gun manufactures.
 
If Gov. Gray Davis does repeal this law, gun manufactures across the country can expect a tidal wave of litigation intended to ultimately put the companies out of business. As much as that action may delight Gov. Davis, who has opposed the gun manufacturers shield law since its onset, and the army of gun-control advocates behind him, it will definitely upset and alarm citizens who utilize and appreciate their right to own guns.
 
Those who support the repeal of the shield statute anticipate that it will force gun manufacturers to be more responsible concerning the aspects of designing and marketing their product.
 
On the contrary, opponents fear the repeal will not only flood the gun industry with lawsuits, but also will unfairly punish gun manufacturers if their product is ever misused. The repeal will also make it possible for people to argue in lawsuits that guns are intrinsically defective because any benefits they may offer are exceeded by the harm they could potentially cause.
 
The shield statute was, and still is, a necessary measure to protect gun manufacturers from endless litigation that comes from the overall controversial subject of guns and gun rights.
 
Although it has been said before, knife manufacturers do not get sued when a knife is used as a tool to murder someone, nor are rope manufacturers sued when someone hangs himself. Thousands of items have the potential to hurt or kill someone when they are used in ways other than how they are intended to be used. Guns, like knives, are not produced to kill innocent people, however, like many other things in the wrong hands they can be used for destructive purposes. This is not the fault of the gun manufacturers and they should not be punished for the actions of criminals.
 
The repeal of the statute should be recognized as what it is, not a way to bring justice to the families of gun victims, but just another under-handed way for Gov. Davis to drive gun manufacturers out of business.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Davis repeal invites litigation

.... Award shows lack substance

.... Campus Progressives strongly oppose new recreation center

Diversions

.... Established artists lead art symposium on campus

.... Diva to perform at Carpenter Center

 

Sports

.... 49ers shoot out Hawaii for title

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved