VOL. X, NO. 57
California State University, Long Beach December 10, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

CSU to propose tuition hikes


By Kimberly Pasquis

On-line Forty-Niner

The California State University system Board of Trustees will be voting on a proposed increase Monday for CSU student tuition after Gov. Gray Davis announced a mid year budget cut Friday.
 
A proposed $10.2 billion in sweeping budget cuts will address the $21 billion to $30 billion deficit of California. These most recent cuts will bring the total CSU budget reductions for 2002 to 2003 to $125 million.
 
Education is a huge portion of the government and it would be unfair for education to not take its fair share, said Byron Tucker, spokesman for Davis.
 
“Education remains the governor’s main priority,” Tucker said. “It is necessary for California to be in a stronger position to meet cuts next year.”
 
A proposed 10 percent tuition increase will affect undergraduates, which translates to $72 per semester and $96 per quarter. Graduate students will experience a 15 percent increase, which will be $114 per semester and $152 per quarter.
 
If passed, increases will begin with the winter session. Students that have already made their spring semester payments will be billed, said Danny Vivian, president for Associated Students Inc.
 
“The CSU was quick to announce that the money would come from student fees,” Vivian said.
 
“[Faculty and staff] have yet to consider ‘Maybe I won’t get my raise’ or ‘Maybe I won’t have such a nice office,’” Vivian said.
 
Each division at Cal State Long Beach has set in place a contingency plan of action in response to the CSU decision for budget cuts.
 
“Most divisions are looking to do an across the board reduction,” said Armando Contreras, executive assistant to CSULB President Robert Maxson.
 
Contreras said that the main priority for CSULB is to maintain classes and services. In order to spread out costs so that no one department suffers more than others, each division at CSULB will be asked to cut spending by 1 percent to 5 percent. Each divisional vice president will decide where to make cuts, Contreras said.
 
CSU had been expecting something like this to happen. In anticipation of more cuts, the 23 CSU campus presidents had been warned earlier this year to be cautious about spending by such means as temporary hiring freezes, not entering into major contracts and not replacing equipment.
 
Contreras said that there will be a percentage that CSU’s will need to give back to the state. Although this percentage will be the same for all CSU campuses, Cal State Long Beach will need to give back the most money because it will be the largest.
 
The California State Student Association is planning a “No Increase in Student Fees” rally at the Chancellor’s Office Monday at 7:30 a.m. The association is encouraging students to take part in this statewide rally.
 
Vivian said that, according to an e-mail, 43 students from Cal State Chico and Sacramento plan to take a bus to downtown Long Beach Sunday to be ready for the rally Monday morning.
 
“The CSSA wants to sit down and see where we can make these cuts,” Vivian said. “The proposal is a crisis one.
 
“The negative amount to accessibility to students will be greater than the positive amount to the budget.”
 
Vivian is encouraging that students take an active role in stating that they will not accept a tuition increase as the final answer to the budget reduction.
 
“[The tuition increase] is a disservice to the CSU who tout their diversity and accessibility to students,” Vivian said. “To flush that down the toilet is an even greater disservice to the students.”
 
The University of California campuses will experience a $74.3 million proposed reduction.
 
Alexis Kindig contributed to this story.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Cross burning reconsidered

.... A call to conscience in a time of war

.... Letters to the editor

 

Diversions

.... Student film showcase to present diverse plots

.... Velvet adds perfect touch to holiday wardrobe

.... ‘They’ disappoints, cheats horror film genre

 

Sports

.... 2nd-half woes sink The Beach


ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved