VOL. X, NO. 38
California State University, Long Beach November 5, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Housing receives props with 46


By Jill Thomsen
On-line Forty-Niner

More than $2 billion in bonds for low-income apartments, homeless shelters, farmworker and migrant housing and more will be approved today if Proposition 46 is passed by California voters.
 
With 23 California State University campuses, passage of the law would naturally result in an issue over how to divide the funds, said Stan Olin, interim director of Housing and Residential Life at Cal State Long Beach.
 
“It is not really a significant amount of money,” Olin said.
 
Parkside Commons, located on the edge of North Campus cost approximately $22 million to build in 1985, a cost that would likely be double today, Olin said. He added that most new project ideas he hears range from $25 million to $60 million in cost.
 
The student housing provision in the measure shows that people in Sacramento are aware of the issue, but the funding may not be adequate for all the programs.
 
“For the funding to be meaningful, it would need to be a whole lot more,” Olin said.
 
The current housing bonds system relies on money from federal, state and local governments to pay for low-income and emergency housing programs. Voters approved the last housing bonds in 1990 and those funds have been spent.
 
The bond measure was introduced by state Sen. John Burton, D-San Francisco, and signed by Gov. Gray Davis. The final step is voter approval on today.
 
The largest amount designated in the measure is $800 million to multi-family housing programs. This would fund a variety of housing projects aimed at the construction of rental housing projects, such as apartment buildings, according to state voting materials. Any project built must also “reserve a portion of its units for low-income households for a period of 55 years.”
 
Several homeownership incentives in the measure are aimed at increasing home ownership for low and middle-income homebuyers. Currently, $25 million is set aside for loans to help school personnel with down payments on a new home. Loan assistance also is included for military veterans, police and firefighters.
 
Opponents to the measure say that the law would only add to the current state debt and does little to truly address housing issues in California.
 
“First-time homebuyers have to purchase their houses in government approved locations,” said state Sen. Ray Haynes, R-Riverside.
 
Proposition 46 would require that the bonds be backed by the state, meaning that the state is required to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. The total cost of the bonds would depend on their interest rates and how long it takes to repay them.
 
Right now, the Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2002 allocates $2.1 billion to fund 21 various housing programs, including $15 million for student housing on or near CSU or University of California campuses.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Several good reasons to vote

 

Diversions

.... ‘Mame’ opens with strong cast, plot

.... Organizers save space, time for less money

 

Sports

.... 49ers finish season strong at home

.... Cross country runs well at Big West Championships

.... Women’s golf claims eighth in tourney

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved