VOL. X, NO. 24
California State University, Long Beach October 10, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Ports busy once again


By Tina Page
On-line Forty-Niner

West Coast ports resumed operations temporarily at 6 p.m. Wednesday until a permanent contract can be negotiated between Pacific Maritime Association and the International Longshore Workers Union. President Bush requested on Monday that a federal court invoke the powers granted in the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act, which would force workers back to the docks for 80 days while contract negotiations continued.
 
U.S. District Judge William Alsup denied the Bush administration the 80-day cooling-off period. Instead, Alsup ordered a temporary restraining order Tuesday that will last until 5 p.m. on Oct. 17 forcing the dockworkers back  to work until that date. Alsup also ordered that the administration return to court on Oct. 16 with evidence to prove that the closure of the ports puts the nation’s health and safety at risk before granting the Taft-Hartley request, National Public Radio’s Lara Sidell said on “Which Way L.A.?” Tuesday evening.
 
The move by the federal government to intervene in negotiation proceedings is being viewed as a blow to the ILWU, according to the Friends of Labor Web site.
 
The PMA claims the forced reopening of the ports as a victory to itself and to the American economy.
 
“The Taft-Hartley forces us to go back to work for 80 days,” the union member said. “During those 80 days the union and management are forced to return to negotiations. At the end of the 80 days the management proposes its final offer for a contract. The entire union (10,500 members) will then vote on whether or not to accept the contract.
 
The PMA claims that the president’s interference is necessary because the ILWU is refusing to accept the contracts that they are proposing, according to the PMA Web site.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Bush manipulates emotions

.... Philosophy and human life

.... Letter to the Editor

 

Forum

.... CFA, CSU discuss tenure-track faculty

.... Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 73 and Task Force Report

.... Funding key to hire permanent faculty

 

Diversions

.... Author, poet hosts event tonight

.... Dance company to perform hula for Long Beach

.... Weekend Calendar

.... Porn ’n Chicken encompasses poor cliches

Sports

.... LBSU manager has big hoop dreams

.... Phillips’ return boosts 49ers title hopes

.... Golfer undergoes surgery

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved