VOL. X, NO. 22
California State University, Long Beach October 8, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Debate shows CSULB apathy


By Kari Schneider
On-line Forty-Niner

Despite Monday’s televised gubernatorial debate many Cal State Long Beach students are still uncertain as to who should lead California.
 
“Honestly I don’t know much about the candidates,” said Tim Boggless, a junior in communications. “I usually vote, and I want to know more about the candidates before I do.”
 
Many students on campus did not watch the debate on television because of class or because they did not know it was happening. Yet at noon, Democrat Gov. Gray Davis and Republican Bill Simon traded charges on live television.
 
“I didn’t know about the debate. I don’t even know who is running,” said Thomas Bang, a senior in management information systems.
 
Richard Haesly, assistant professor of political science said, “I was surprised to hear that the debate was during the day.”
 
Haesly said that it is pretty clear that Davis doesn’t want to debate. By having the debate in the middle of the day, it impacts the percent of people who could have watched it.
 
“Davis has focused his campaign on ads encouraging democrats to vote,” Haesly said.
 
Yet, some students are ready for the upcoming election.
 
“I am voting for Davis, I am strongly democratic,” said Robyn Halfhill, a junior in history. “I have strong issues that I support and if one candidate would do more for [the issues] than the other, then I would switch.”
 
The governor wants to rebuild voters’ confidence after the state’s energy crisis last year.
 
“This has been an election that has been so lacking in a discussion of the issues, and the voters have told us that’s what they want the candidates to do,” said Mark Baldassare, survey director for the Public Policy Institute of California.
 
Liam Scheff, a senior in education said, “Most people don’t vote because both parties are beholder to large economic interests not to the people they represent.”
 
During the hour-long debate Davis defended his four-year record, while Simon used the appearance to blame the current governor for the state’s economic downturn and for spending the record surplus budget. Simon accused Davis of mismanaging the state budget from a record budget surplus into a record budget deficit.
 
Simon called on Davis to apologize to all Californians for the disastrous four years in office, particularly the awful ethical tone that has been set in the administration.
 
Davis responded using his progress on education, health care, the environment and public safety.
 
Statewide polls show neither candidate is popular with voters.
 
The Associated Press contributed to this story.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Debates should be mandatory

.... Corporate greed hurting economy

Diversions

.... Rick Thomas brings bag of tricks to Long Beach

.... ‘Notorious C.H.O.’ leaves audience in stitches

.... Logo overload hinders fashion sense

.... Queen Mary’s Shipwreck a total wreck

.... The Listening Lounge

 

Sports

.... Thomas leads with fun, focused attitude

.... 49ers score twice, tie Idaho


ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved