VOL. X, NO. 57
California State University, Long Beach December 10, 2002
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Michael Watanabe
Editor in Chief

Alisha Gomez
Managing Editor

Kimberly Pasquis
News Editor

Adrienne Figueroa
City Editor

Kristen Force
Assistant City Editor

Rachelle Youngman
Opinion Editor

Heather Clarke
Diversions Editor

Ben D. Dimapindan
Sports Editor

Tom Carey
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations
Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

‘They’ disappoints, cheats horror film genre


By Oscar Montealegre

On-line Forty-Niner

“Wes Craven Presents: They” is intended to be a horror movie, however the only goose bumps that popped out of my body were not because of the horror, but instead of the comedy that made me giggle throughout the movie.
 
Also, what is interesting is that Wes Craven did not direct or write the screenplay for “They.” Wes Craven did not even participate in producing the production of ‘They.” Yet, his name is included in the title. Without a doubt, the studio inserts his name on the title for marketing reasons, banking on the notion that Wes Craven’s creation of “Nightmare on Elm Street” will attract movie viewers. To be honest, it is not a bad tactic.
 
However, viewers are getting cheated and this is not the first time either. Wes Craven had his name included in the title of “Wishmaster” and “Dracula 2000.” By the way, both movies I just mentioned were also failures, which belong to the recent movement of converting horror movies into jokes. I really do wonder if Wes Craven knows that his name was included on the title of these movies.
 
“Wes Craven Presents: They” has a weak story which includes mediocre acting. Basically, the movie is about a graduate student of psychology (Julia Lund), who witnesses a horrific and traumatic event. Gradually she is beginning to realize that everything that scared her as a child could actually be real. Eventually, her life worsens when her childhood horrors are on route to get her.
 
The monsters in “They” are not really explained. The viewers get no explanation of their origins, which has also a problem on the recent horror success , “The Ring.” If screenwriters or studio producers feel it is not important to explain the origins and the conditions of the monsters, then they do not realize that it only weakens the horror movie.
 
Nevertheless, “Wes Craven Presents: They” is a movie production that demanded and required the time and effort of the actors and the collective crew, just like any other movie. Therefore, as an aspiring filmmaker, I respect the creation of the movie but I truly feel it was a waste of electricity on the film projectors that exhibited this movie. I do not recommend this movie and I encourage students to do whatever possible to avoid watching “Wes Craven Presents: They.”



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

Opinion

.... Cross burning reconsidered

.... A call to conscience in a time of war

.... Letters to the editor

 

Diversions

.... Student film showcase to present diverse plots

.... Velvet adds perfect touch to holiday wardrobe

.... ‘They’ disappoints, cheats horror film genre

 

Sports

.... 2nd-half woes sink The Beach


ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved