Online 49er Flag
Online Forty-Niner Opinion
.

ADVERTISEMENT

.

VOL. VIII, NO. 85
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH
MARCH 13, 2001


CLASSIFIEDS CLICK HERE

    • Jobs
    • Housing
    • Announcements


New:

POLLS
Bulletin Board
Daily 49er e-shop




Search our site




ONLINE 49ER
DEPARTMENTS

ADVERTISING

CONTACT

DAILY 49ER ALUMNI




Editorial Staff

Andres Cardenas
Editor in Chief

Chris Lew
Managing Editor

Marten Lewerth
News Editor

Christina Esparza
Assistant News Editor

Lyndsey Shinoda
City Editor

Phil Witte
Opinion Editor

Don Weberg
Diversions Editor

Alexander Gordon
Sports Editor

William Mulligan
Publisher

Henrietta Charles
News-Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

opinion: our view

Make mine blond

At a scientific forum held in Rome this weekend, a team of scientists announced to the world that they would be able to clone humans within two years.

Since the group is a multinational collective using private funding in independent laboratories, they are not regulated by any government or beholden to any countries' citizens whose taxes provide their funding.

This means all the hand-wringing politicians we will hear from about the ethics and morality of cloning will be pointless as no one body will have direct jurisdiction.

The team announced it has received thousands of positive e-mails from infertile couples who want help from doctors in having children.

Most in the audience at the forum were protestors and scientists opposed to group's intentions, both on moral and scientific grounds.

Since by definition a clone is a duplication of a living being, how exactly are the scientists going to work with infertile couples to produce a child? Mix in a little of mom and a little of dad to create the perfect uber-child?

Not exactly as the couple would have to pick which parent to duplicate, or find some other DNA, from a willing or unwilling source. With sperm banks and egg donation services, the possibility for designing a perfect child are practically here.

Imagine the temptation of snatching a hair sample from a celebrity or superstar athlete when the doctor asks for sample DNA to create your new child.

People have more scruples than that, right?

If scientists start creating offspring by cloning infertile parents, won't they create infertile offspring who will then need to clone to reproduce, diminishing the quality with each generation?

Rather than adopt an already living and unwanted child in this overpopulated world, selfish and vain people will pay whatever price to these greedy scientists to create progeny.

Whether looking at the situation scientifically or morally, creating new life for infertile couples is not right.

Nature is an impartial arbiter which selects species that will survive and which members of those species will reproduce. Only the strong survive and only they should pass down their genes to the next generation, be it elks or humans.

Morally, scientists are playing God by creating life from where it does not exist. God did not create in vitro fertilization and cloning to give children to barren couples. God made them infertile in the first place.

Science made the advance to get around God and nature.

Eventually once the complete map of the human genome is available couples will be able to fine tune and select the traits they want their offspring to possess. Soon science will have one-stop shopping with checklists of traits people can request in their children.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

opinion

diversions

sports


©2000 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved. 

ADVERTISEMENT