Online 49er Flag
Online Forty-Niner Opinion
.

ADVERTISEMENT

.

VOL. VIII, NO. 69
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH
FEBRUARY 12, 2001


CLASSIFIEDS CLICK HERE

    • Jobs
    • Housing
    • Announcements


New:

POLLS
Bulletin Board
Daily 49er e-shop




Search our site




ONLINE 49ER
DEPARTMENTS

ADVERTISING

CONTACT

DAILY 49ER ALUMNI




Editorial Staff

Andres Cardenas
Editor in Chief

Chris Lew
Managing Editor

Marten Lewerth
News Editor

Christina Esparza
Assistant News Editor

Lyndsey Shinoda
City Editor

Phil Witte
Opinion Editor

Don Weberg
Diversions Editor

Alexander Gordon
Sports Editor

William Mulligan
Publisher

Henrietta Charles
News-Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

opinion: our view

Missile defense wasteful

In an effort to make Americans feel safe at night, President Bush is making a missile defense system a major factor in his new administration.

The idea of a missile defense system began during the Reagan administration when it was devised as a space-based system that would use laser to shoot down incoming missiles. This plan proved to be not only technically unfeasible but also illegal, as it violated the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972.

This did not deter the government from trying to develop the system through both the Bush and Clinton administrations, but without success.

As it stands now, the plan calls for a three-part defensive system, based on the ground, in the sea, and in space. A full-scale system could cost as much as $240 million, but to date, has not been successfully tested.

The theory behind the system is that a country with nuclear capability, and the number is growing annually, would be reluctant to launch missiles against the United States or its allies with a defensive shield in place. This is ludicrous.

Any nation that would consider launching a ballistic missile would face swift and severe retaliation from the United States' massive nuclear arsenal. That is the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction that kept the United States and the former Soviet Union from attacking each other during the Cold War.

There are a myriad of other ways that a country could wage a dangerous attack against the United States.

CIA Chief George Tenet listed Osama bin Laden's terrorist network as the greatest security threat to America. The domestic terrorist attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building showed that the world contains more diverse threats than the traditional bogeyman of the Evil Empire of Soviet Russia.

The United States is more vulnerable through our growing dependence on the World Wide Web for communications than from some rouge nation that got a nuclear missile on sale from some international arms dealer. A well-placed virus in some government or business computers would wreak havoc on technologically obsessed Americans.

The main beneficiary of a proposed missile defense system would be the defense contractors that stand to reap billions in government contracts for products that probably will not work.

A strong defense is vital to the well being of a nation's citizens. Rather than throw billions of dollars down a hole in a chase for the mythical "Star Wars" system that will protect us from all perceived evil, the Bush administration should spend more time and effort in improving the overall quality and morale of the armed forces.

opinion

diversions

sports


©2000 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved. 

ADVERTISEMENT