Online 49er Flag
Online Forty-Niner Opinion
.

ADVERTISEMENT

.

VOL. VIII, NO. 115
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH
MAY 10, 2001


CLASSIFIEDS CLICK HERE

    • Jobs
    • Housing
    • Announcements


New:

POLLS
Bulletin Board
Daily 49er e-shop




Search our site




ONLINE 49ER
DEPARTMENTS

ADVERTISING

CONTACT

DAILY 49ER ALUMNI




Editorial Staff

Andres Cardenas
Editor in Chief

Chris Lew
Managing Editor

Marten Lewerth
News Editor

Christina Esparza
Assistant News Editor

Lyndsey Shinoda
City Editor

Phil Witte
Opinion Editor

Don Weberg
Diversions Editor

Alexander Gordon
Sports Editor

William Mulligan
Publisher

Henrietta Charles
News-Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

opinion: our view

Make love, not lasers

In a speech Tuesday, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld outlined a bold new plan in which the military would deploy weapons in space to protect us from all the boogeymen that pose a threat to national security.

The plan resurrects the mythical "Star Wars" plan dreamed up by Ronald Reagan, which was envisioned as a battalion of lasers in space that would obliterate any incoming ballistic missile from the evil Soviet Empire.

In reality, the plan is just a way for the government to create overinflated scenarios of destruction so they can justify giving billions of dollars to their friends in the defense industry to spend on weapons that do not work.

The plan was unfeasible then, and it is unfeasible now.

To begin with, most attempts at a missile intercept system have never worked. When the missiles that were supposed to intercept the incoming target kept missing, the military just changed the definition of "hit" to mean an interception that comes within 10 miles of its target.

Despite the wonderful footage on CNN that showed every U.S. missile going down the chimney of its intended Iraqi target during the Gulf War, the actual success rate was much lower.

If a proposed weapon was able to fire a laser, we also must take into consideration where it would land when it misses the target. An intercepting missile would attempt to intercept its target on the way and would land in the ocean if it missed.

An intercepting laser that misses its target would blast a hole into whatever poor soul that happened to be underneath it, even you.

We will not even begin to discuss how many treaties a missile defense system would violate, but Rumsfeld's comments that treaties with the Soviet Union are no longer valid because the country no longer exists must be taken with a grain of salt.

When the Soviet Union broke up, one country insisted all the splinter states created must abide by treaties signed by the Soviets. That country? The United States, of course.

Unfortunately, we cannot hold onto the hope that plans for a space missile will die with the end of the Bush administration.

Bombarding Congress with angry letters is probably just as pointless, as those same defense contractors give money to them also. We'll just sit around and wait for peace to break out; that's just as likely to happen.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement


©2000 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved. 

ADVERTISEMENT