Online 49er Flag
Online Forty-Niner News
.

ADVERTISEMENT

.

VOL. VIII, NO. 115
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH
MAY 10, 2001


CLASSIFIEDS CLICK HERE

    • Jobs
    • Housing
    • Announcements


New:

POLLS
Bulletin Board
Daily 49er e-shop




Search our site




ONLINE 49ER
DEPARTMENTS

ADVERTISING

CONTACT

DAILY 49ER ALUMNI




Editorial Staff

Andres Cardenas
Editor in Chief

Chris Lew
Managing Editor

Marten Lewerth
News Editor

Christina Esparza
Assistant News Editor

Lyndsey Shinoda
City Editor

Phil Witte
Opinion Editor

Don Weberg
Diversions Editor

Alexander Gordon
Sports Editor

William Mulligan
Publisher

Henrietta Charles
News-Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

news:

Teacher evaluations draw mixed results

By Danielle Grossman
On-line Forty-Niner

Cal State Long Beach has been conducting a study for the past five years in an effort to change the current teacher evaluations, making them more effective.

"I think the evaluations are a good idea," said professor Tim Caron, "but I think it's an inferior system for evaluating the course. It's vital to get feedback, and it's better to have something that's not perfect than nothing at all."

A lot of professors agree that the current evaluations are not as informative as they should be.

"I think they're a good thing to have, but I think they could be re-written," said Sidney Fox, a psychology department instructor. "If a student gets a bad grade, it's hard to distinguish the difference between the class and the student's efforts. A student with a good grade will find the class good."

The university has been researching a possible new evaluation called Ideas, written by a non-profit organization. A sample survey was given to about 40-50 professors in more than 100 courses to use on their students.

The new evaluation comes in two forms, a short form that lets the professor know if they're meeting the course objective, and a long form that allows for a deep diagnostic. The long form is about 40 questions long, and it gives the professor a more detailed evaluation of the course, but it would probably be used only occasionally, with the short form being used more often.

While most professors agree that a change is needed, not all professors like the more diagnostic form. The university plans to have another trial next year. If the new forms are not accepted, there will be changes made in the current evaluation by the following year.

Teacher evaluations are used for two different reasons: to evaluate professors, such as during a promotion, and to evaluate classes to help professors make classes better.

"I think they're a very good idea for the purpose of having faculty improve their teaching," said Wayne Dick, chair of Faculty Personnel Policies Council. "It's very useful data when you choose to use it and most do."

Teacher evaluations are completely anonymous and are not given back to the professors until long after students' grades have been turned in. The multiple choice answers are also given back calculated and averaged so that professors know statistically how students rated them on each question.

Most professors take the time to go over the comments and agree that any negative comments from students are constructive.

"For the most part, students take them seriously," said Caron. "They're helpful and not mean-spirited."

"You can always count on one person having a problem," said Dick, "but it's very rare for just one person dumping on me. Some people get very annoyed. The negative ones hurt your feelings, but they also give you some direction. Every fourth semester a class has to be re-worked and the first time through is always a little rough. Students are an enormous help."

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement


©2000 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved. 

ADVERTISEMENT