Online Forty-Niner: Fall 2001: OPINION
Online 49er Flag
. ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
NEWS | OPINION | DIVERSIONS | SPORTS | CLASSIFIEDS | BACK TO SCHOOL
POLLS | BULLETIN BOARD
| SHOP | CALENDAR | KALEIDOSCOPE 2001 | SURVIVAL GUIDE

LONG BEACH VA HOSPITAL-BLOOD HOTLINE (562) 494-2611 EXT. 2823 RED CROSS - 1-800-GIVE LIFE
.
VOL. IX, NO. 60
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH
December 10-14, 2001


ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

CLASSIFIEDS CLICK HERE

  • Jobs
  • Housing
  • Announcements


POLLS
BULLETIN BOARD
DAILY 49ER E-SHOP




Editorial Staff

Phil Witte
Editor in Chief

Lyndsey Shinoda
Managing Editor

Michael Watanabe
News Editor

Jamie Rogers
City Editor

Christine Shin
Diversions Editor

Mike Haubrich
Sports Editor

Cara Gavcia
Photo Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations Director

William Mulligan
Publisher

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

opinion

Why choose to protect Afghanistan?

I don't agree with many things the U.S. government does, and the ethics of the United States and its war on terrorism is no exception. I am disappointed with the U.S. government's decision to wage war on terrorism, a.k.a. Osama bin Laden, for a few reasons.

Obviously, terrorists killed thousands of innocent people in the bombing of the World Trade Center. And what about the unjust treatment of millions of Afghan people by the Taliban? I question these reasons. It seems that the U.S. government has ulterior motives in waging this war.

In no way do I think that the thousands of people killed in the WTC bombings is acceptable. But I think the U.S. government is using that tragedy and the images of that day as a tool to increase patriotism and to gain support for the war on terrorism.

The U.S. government has consistently told Palestine and Israel to stop retaliating against one another in the battle for land because the war would never end if neither side stops. But as soon as the United States was attacked, the first thought we had was retaliate.

Some people were so ignorant as to say that the United States should go out and just bomb the whole country of Afghanistan. It's amazing to me how the government can say one thing and then go out and do the exact opposite. I don't see the war on terrorism as an effective tool to accomplish the United States' goals. If bin Laden is killed, the United States will find other terrorist acts committed against our country, and the cycle will continue.

The war on terrorism could have also been brought about by the unjust treatment of millions of Afghan people by the Taliban. It seems odd that the United States would wage war to help the innocent people of Afghanistan. I'm not saying that helping them is wrong, but the United States is not going to war solely to help the people of Afghanistan. The whole world has oppressive governments and the United States has not helped any of them in the manner that they are helping Afghanistan. So the question becomes, why are we helping Afghanistan?

My answer: To protect U.S. interests. This is where ethics come into play. What is it then that makes our interests so important that it's okay to kill the innocent people of Afghanistan and call them casualties of war? And, what makes the Taliban any different from the United States?

Our great nation was built at the expense of others and it continues to exploit the poor and reward the rich. As Ralph Waldo Emerson best put it, "It is one of the most beautiful compensations of life, that no man can sincerely try to help another without helping himself."

Royce Mori is a journalism major at Cal State Long Beach.

filler

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT


Search our site




DEPARTMENT OF
JOURNALISM


ONLINE 49ER

DEPARTMENTS

ADVERTISING
ADMINISTRATION
DAILY 49ER ALUMNI
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE


GIVE FEEDBACK

news

opinion

diversions

sports

.

ADVERTISEMENT

House Ads

ADVERTISEMENT


©2001 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved.