|
![[opinion]](http://www.csulb.edu/%7Ed49er/Icon/opinion.gif)
State
Assembly blew it
The state
Assembly had the chance to do the right thing and impose
contribution restrictions on the scandal-plagued Insurance
Commissioner's office, but blew it.
Senate
Bill 953, introduced by Jackie Speier, D-San Francisco,
would have set a $250 contribution limit on insurance
companies under regulatory review and imposed fines
if the law was violated. It passed the Senate, but
the Assembly defeated the bill 34 to 27.
State legislators
jockeyed for opportunities to reform the office, tainted
by allegations of former Insurance Commissioner Chuck
Quackenbush using the post to shake down insurers
for donations to selected charities instead of levying
heavy fines.
Quackenbush
resigned in disgrace in June, ending a promising political
career. Sundry proposals for reform came from politicians
and consumer advocates.
Reverting
the insurance commissioner to a position appointed
by the governor is unpopular with the state's
electorate. Campaign contribution limits, however,
are always popular.
If there
is any office that needs limits, it is the insurance
commissioner's. Unlike the legislature, which can
see support flowing from myriad business and ideological
groups, the insurance commissioner sees virtually
all of its money coming from the very industry it
is supposed to regulate.
Without
any restrictions -- which is the case right now in
California -- we will see more Quackenbush's who will
use the position to coddle the multi-billion-dollar
insurance industry at the expense of protecting.
So, just
why did our legislators drop the ball?
Simple.
If SB 953 were passed, it would set a dangerous precedent.
Contribution limits may go over so well with voters
that they may demand more, maybe even for the legislators
themselves. Oh, the horror!
The bill's
opposition came primarily from Republicans, possibly
still
bitter over the humiliating loss of comrade Quackenbush.
Seven Democrats also voted against the bill, despite
support from current and former Assembly Speakers
Bob Hertzberg and Antonio Villa-raigosa. But the 27
assemblymen who voted for SB 953 were all Democrats.
Like many
other acts of legislation that would have had a profound
benefit for the 30 million ordinary folks living in
California, SB 953 never made it out of the Capitol.
Soon after
the bill's defeat, Speier threatened to take the contribution
reform package before the voters as an initiative
if the legislature does not pass the bill next time
around. Pundits are speculating that once Speier is
termed out of the Senate, she plans to run for Insurance
Commissioner herself, and her reform efforts are merely
window dressing.
There is
always the possibility, but the policyholders of California
should not have a bureaucracy that flouts them for
Big Insurance and the almighty dollar.
|