|
![[opinion]](http://www.csulb.edu/%7Ed49er/Icon/opinion.gif)
Electoral
College is outdated, unfair
Chris
Ledermuller
Question:
What modern-day nation does not allow its own citizens
to elect their own leader and has a little-known political
apparatus that can override the will of the populace
to ever seek reform?
Answer:
This bleak picture may sound like nations in Latin
America or the former Yugoslavia, but it describes
one of the freest, wealthiest countries in the world.
This is actually the United States.
The political
apparatus is the Electoral College, an 18th-century
relic that determines which one of two men will govern
over 250 million Americans, regardless of who they
chose to be their leader.
Last Tuesday's
election and the aftermath clearly show why this apparatus
should be abolished.
The Electoral
College is made up of 538 electors who pledge to vote
for their party's candidate should he get the most
votes in the state. The total number of Representatives
and Senators in the state determines electoral votes.
The District of Columbia has three electoral votes.
The ballot
debacle in Florida illustrates the problem of the
Electoral College. Vice President Al Gore and Texas
Gov. George Bush are fighting over 25 winner-take-all
electoral votes. Whoever has the most votes in Florida
will have enough votes to go to the White House. Bush
could have the most votes in Florida and win the presidency,
but he would still have fewer votes nationally than
Gore. This allows the Electoral College to make a
shortcut around the will of the people.
Another
way a presidential candidate can use the Electoral
College to override the popular vote is by winning
just 11 states: California, New York, Texas, Florida,
Pennsylvania, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, New Jersey,
North Carolina and Virginia. Imagine if a president
carried the popular vote of 39 states and still lost
the vote.
This type
of mischief should not be possible in modern America.
Back in the nation's infancy, most of the country
was undeveloped, transportation and communication
lines were poor and voting was limited to white males
who owned property.
Our Founding
Fathers believed an elite above the elite was needed
to choose a president.
Another
good reason to abolish the Electoral College has to
do with fairness. The Founding Fathers designed the
Electoral College to be unfair. The Framers wanted
the United States to be a federal aristocracy, which
is why democracy only applied to white male property
owners.
The Electoral
College was created to perpetuate this system and
not allow any mischief-makers like third parties to
meddle with an elitist paradise.
The United
States has matured in 200 years, much to the gentry's
chagrin. With a few exceptions, any American citizen
over 18 years old can vote. Also, transportation and
communications systems are so sophisticated that anybody
around the world, not just the United States, can
get an abundance of information about presidential
candidates.
The main
argument of Electoral College proponents say the current
system is fair to smaller states, so their votes won't
be overwhelmed by New York or California. Supporters
say, "what about the states?"
What about
the states?
After all,
a president represents people, not 50 arbitrarily
defined political boundaries. Under a one-person,
one-vote direct democracy, where a liberal, conservative
or any other political orientation happens to reside
would not matter.
A vote
in California would truly be equal to a vote in Wyoming,
rather than 54 important electoral votes versus 3
inconsequential votes. The theoretical advantage the
Electoral College gives small states still favors
large states.
The only
way small states, large states and most importantly,
the people who have to live by the laws of the land,
truly would have fair representation if a direct democratic
vote replaces the Electoral College.
Not only
would the chaos of last Tuesday's election disappear,
but for a nation that cherishes individual rights
and fair representation, direct democracy is the American
Way.
Chris
Ledermuller is a print journalism major and a Daily
Forty-Niner staff writer.
|