|
![[diversions]](http://www.csulb.edu/%7Ed49er/Icon/diversions.gif)
Roundup
reminisces on 'Survivor Series'
Fans, the
World Wrestling Federation held its monthly pay-per-view,
"Survivor Series," on Sunday. "Survivor
Series" has been a WWF mainstay for over a decade,
but now it is just another pay-per-view. With several
singles matches for the three-hour show, "Survivor
Series" has strayed too far from its original
format, and it should really go back.
Once, "Survivor
Series" was a special pay-per-view devoted to
watching two teams of four men battle in the squared
circle. To win the match, all four members of a team
must be eliminated.
This year,
out of nine matches, only two were four-man team elimination
matches. How sad.
Fans acknowledge
that wrestling is scripted and still tune in week
after week as long as the storylines are watchable.
This is more reason than ever to go back to the "Survivor
Series" format of yore.
Chris
Ledermuller
There are
several ways to compose an interesting four-man team.
For instance, mix up the teams so that two wrestlers
who are actively feuding end up as partners for just
one night. The match can go in many different directions,
from the wrestler attacking his partner from the onset
to two hated rivals working together to the amazement
of the fans.
There is
also the marquee four-man team. This is where four
of the WWF's biggest babyfaces wrestle four heel counterparts.
This year, a great team could have been "Stone
Cold" Steve Austin, The Rock, Chris Jericho and
the Undertaker in one corner, Triple H, Rikishi, Kurt
Angle and Kane in the other.
Heck, the
above match can also incorporate intra-team tension,
making the battle all the more interesting. Triple
H may have turned heel, but he still has unresolved
issues with Angle. Also, Austin and Undertaker pride
themselves on being mavericks, so there is the opportunity
of seeing them pound on their own teammates just for
the fun of it.
Also, the
WWF seriously needs to diversify pay-per-views. Wrestling
fans shell out $30 a month for a pay-per-view, even
more if they see it live. Most pay-per-views feature
only a night of several matches. But this is what
"Raw is War" and "SmackDown!"
do as well. Why should wrestling fans shell out $30
bucks a month when they could get matches for no additional
cost on cable or UPN?
A pay-per-view
themed around a single gimmick match would break the
monotony. "Survivor Series" should still
have a few non-elimination matches, but only reserved
for championship defenses. The rest should be the
traditional elimination matches.
Right now,
the WWF only has two gimmick-themed pay-per-views,
"Royal Rumble" and "King of the Ring."
A third would certainly help.
Until next
week, fans, keep watching.
Chris
Ledermuller is a print journalism major at Cal State
Long Beach.
|