Race sparks policy
By Johnna Walker
Daily Fory-Niner
A controversial bill made its way from
the state capitol to the Associated Students Senate meeting last week.
Senate Bill 78, which would require the
Department of Justice to include statistics reflecting the race or ethnicity
of traffic violators in its annual report, recently moved to the floor
of the state Assembly.
The bill was brought to the attention of
the A.S. Senate and students during a meeting Wednesday. A.S.I. Vice President
Sheryl Mauricio addressed the bill and asked for student feedback.
"There are good and bad cops and if they're
bad, they deserve to be dealt with accordingly," said Jose Ayala, A.S.
senator for the College of Liberal Arts.
The billís purpose is to determine whether
police officers pull over more African Americans and Latinos than white
citizens based on evidence, according to a report issued by at the American
Civil Liberties Union.
"It's really up to the department to observe
the officersí demeanor," CSULB University Police Sgt. Bonnie Meyers said.
"If their behavior is discriminatory in any way, then itís a training issue."
Mauricio told the Senate that there is
already a section on traffic tickets issued by University Police, which
should require officiers to specify the race of the individuals cited.
Meyers confirmed that on-campus officers
are required to fill that section.
A few students addressed their concerns
about the issue, but the A.S. Senate did not take a formal stand on the
bill.
Some Cal State Long Beach faculty and staff
members are skeptical towards the proposal.
"African American males and females have
experienced these issues at the hands of the police, so we know first hand,î
said David Love, CSULB Black Student Union president. "If the system can
be trusted to be honest enough to record these incidents, it will be helpful."
According to the Official California Legislative
Information Web site, the department would also be required to provide
statistics on procedural information such as the number of individuals
stopped, whether a citation or warning was issued, and the alleged traffic
infraction.
Other details would include whether or
not a search was instituted, the legal basis for the search, whether any
contraband or property was seized and whether an oral or written warning
or citation and possible arrests resulted form the stop.
This information for the annual report
would be obtained from law enforcement officials who would record this
data after making routine traffic stops, according to the web site.
This information would not, however, identify
the specific officers who pulled over the motorits.
Meyers agreed with the California Peace
Officers Association and the California Police Chiefs Association, which
formally stated that the bill would not be an effective way to modify any
problems without singling out officers. |