Professors don't profit from books
Mark Blackburn seems to be unaware of several
points about the publishing of textbooks.
First of all textbook publishers are not
going to put up the money to print, distribute and promote books unless
they expect a healthy return on their investment.
Publishers regularly ask professors in
a given field to review manuscripts to determine their potential as textbooks
and negative reports will usually result it a book's early death.
Textbook editors are also careful about
choosing books for publication, because their jobs are riding on the book's
success.
In addition, publishers count on selling
lots of copies, which means they expect not only the author to use it in
his class, but a significant number of professors around the country must
also adopt it.
Professors spend a great deal of effort
selecting books for their classes, and they are not going to choose ones
that are poorly written, inaccurate or out of date.
The greater problem for professors is that
there frequently are so many textbooks out there to choose from.
Thus, if a book passes these many levels
of review and is successful, the author deserves to be rewarded.
Publishers pay authors royalties around
10 percent of the retail price of a book.
Thus, a $50 book will net the author about
$3.50 after taxes.
Even if the book is enormously popular
by textbook standards, it's not likely to make the author wealthy.
There are, of course, some notable exceptions.
Authors of widely used textbooks in general
biology and general chemistry have enjoyed rich returns for their efforts,
but they are in the great minority.
Most textbook authors consider themselves
lucky if they can cover their expenses.
-- David M. Carlberg,
Ph.D. Professor
Department of Biological Sciences |