Don't blame police
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled this week that
people injured in high-speed pursuits cannot sue police.
Suing the police for doing their job is
outrageous.
Granted, people who are hurt in these pursuits
need some form of compensation, but it is not the officer's fault criminal's
flee.
If anyone should be sued and punished,
it should be the criminal.
He is breaking the laws.
Suing police for doing their jobs would
be like allowing students to sue teachers for making them do homework,
or football players suing their coach for making them endure Hell Week.
Unfortunately, when a fleeing criminal
hurts an innocent person, he gets away.
This is because the police stop to assist
the injured person.
The people who brought these cases to the
Supreme Court claim that the police are more concerned with apprehending
the suspect than the safety of the bystanders.
If that is the case, why do the police
stop to help the injured instead of continuing the pursuit?
An attorney for one plaintiff, Stephen
Yagman, told the Los Angeles Times that he thinks 95 percent of people
would want innocent people to be compensated for their injuries.
That may be, but should the police provide
the compensation?
Or should we leave that to the criminals
who create the dangers in the first place?
Now we know the high court is on the side
of the police.
Why aren't the rest of us? |