Faculty unions help all employees
As CFA members, we would like to correct some
misperceptions in Our View of 10/19, "Lame Union Fee."
First, the California Senate Bill 645,
The Fair Share bill does exactly what the name states: that is, it requires
(not the loaded "forces") faculty to pay their fair share of the costs
incurred by the California Faculty Association for work it does on their
behalf, namely, representing their interests.
The faculty who choose not to join the
union, do not pay "dues" as the writer states, but a fair share fee, which
is a percentage of the dues.
The editorial contains its own rebuttal
when it states: "The union would be supported by its members.
Yes, the union represents all faculty ...
But it should represent only the faculty who join the union ... (those)
who do not join the union should not be represented. It is as
simple as that."
It is NOT as simple as that.
The fact that the Higher Education Employer/Employee
Relations Act, HEERA, by law requires the Faculty Association to represent
ALL faculty.
It is called "the duty of fair representation,"
as for example in the current recognition of the need to reduce class size
and teaching load.
Imagine what would happen if the union
bargained only for members.
Only 38 percent of the faculty would have
salary, benefits, class size protections, and representation in cases of
unfair treatment. 62 percent would have to negotiate on their own,
individually.
That's like saying that the workers in
this country as a whole who do not belong to a union -- the vast majority
-- should give back paid vacations, sick leave, pension and insurance plans,
Social Security, the 8-hour day, and the weekend.
Some of these workers' rights were won
and bargained for by labor unions over the years and are currently under
attack.
-- Martin Fiebert, psychology professor,
member of the California Faculty Association |