Shoppers decide where to buy
In its untiring effort to lead the United
States to fascism with all possible dispatch, the California State Legislature
has enacted a law to save its unsuspecting citizens from groceries at Wal-Mart!
Sheldon Richman
The bill, which awaits the governor's
signature, would make it impossible for Wal-Mart and other so-called big-box
retail stores to compete with supermarkets.
With the disingenuousness common to many
edicts today, the bill would outlaw stores exceeding 100,000 square feet
if they devote 15,000 square feet or more to groceries and drugs.
It is easy to tell who supports the protectionist
measure: labor unions, major supermarket chains, and self-styled consumer
groups. Conspicuously absent from the roll: the mass of consumers.
Opponents of the bill, besides direct victims
Wal-Mart, Kmart and Target, are municipal leaders, business and community
associations, and consumers.
They ultimately decide who stays in business
and who does not. They do so by being free to buy, or not buy, from
entrepreneurs, who are incessantly striving to please them.
Consumers are picky and fickle.p They know
what they like, but they also change their minds without notice, leaving
long-standing suppliers in the lurch. There's nothing wrong with
that. The economic system exists to benefit consumers.
Strictly speaking, big discount chains
cannot put small retailers out of business. Only consumers can do that.
Wal-Mart can open a big beautiful store and offer desirable products at
low prices.
But the decision to step into the store
rests in the hands of each consumer. If enough of them head to Wal-Mart
and forsake the little shop they used to patronize, they are responsible
for what happens.
This is not to say that in a market everyone
is happy with everything that takes place.
A consumer who likes paying higher prices
at a little retailer will be saddened if it closes after Wal-Mart opens.
Grown-ups are supposed to understand that they don't always get their way.
If our favorite shop goes under, it will
be because other people exercised their freedom and bought from someone
else. When such matters are left to legislatures, politicians and special
interests call the shots and empower the sheriff to interfere with peaceful
commerce.
Shrouding the violent, special-interest-driven
legislative process in the term "democracy" should not obscure what really
happens.
No one in the marketplace who defies the
interests of consumers stays in business for long. Yet politicians
who everyday defy the people's interests in freedom stay in office for
years. If that is democracy, freedom-loving people should want none
of it.
Sheldon Richman is the editor of The
Freeman: Ideas on Liberty magazine. |