Little merit in background check
The Los Angeles County District Attorney's
office confirmed last Wednesday the resignation of a staff prosecutor found
civilly liable for killing a man more than 10 years ago.
Mark Blackburn
Never criminally convicted, prosecutor
Matt Horeczko was not required to list the civil suit on his job application
and worked in the office for more than five months before his background
was checked out.
I am not sure what bothers me more, the
fact that the D.A.'s office, a group designed to prosecute and convict
criminals to make our county a better place to live, can't even complete
a simple background check on their employees, or the fact that the man,
never criminally charged, is being treated like a stone-cold killer.
Lets start with the second point.
We have seen this happen before with the
O.J. Simpson case. Simpson was held, tried and found not guilty of the
crime of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. What all that legal jargon means
is that 12 people believed that there was a slight possibility that Simpson
did not kill his ex-wife and her boyfriend.
Even with a nationally televised reading
of the not guilty verdict people still treat Simpson like a criminal. He
has trouble finding places to eat, live, play golf and is regularly harassed
on the street by people wanting to "shake hands with a murderer."
Horeczko was never even criminally charged
with the murder he was accused of 10 years and the Los Angeles Times reported
Thursday that the Los Angeles Police Department lists the case as cleared.
However he is being held to same standard as a guilty man.
Granted, both Simpson and Horeczko were
found liable in a civil court. But a civil trial does not have the same
standard that a criminal court does. To be found civilly liable, a six
person jury or a judge has to believe that the individual contributed to
the death.
If you throw a party where alcohol is
served and a person drinks too much, crashes their car and dies, you can
be found civilly liable for that death because you supplied the booze.
Worst of all, Horeczko is now guilty in
the eyes of his boss, District Attorney Gil Garcetti, the top legal eagle
in all of Los Angeles who should know the difference between being convicted
in a criminal trial and being found civilly liable.
Garcetti's office stated to the Times
that they perform a background verification after the person is hired and
that it can take up to 120 days to complete.
That means for about four months
anyone with the ability to lie on a job application can work as a prosecutor
in the D.A.'s office without a problem. It took the D.A.'s office more
than five months to find out, 30 days past the supposed cut off time.
All they had to do was check his state
bar review form, an application filled out by law graduates and lawyers
from other states, to practice law in California. It asks if the person
was ever involved in a civil action.
Horeczko not only answered the question
truthfully, the bar found no cause not to grant him a license to practice.
No similar question appears on the D.A.'s application.
Oddly enough, in the same section on the
same day the Horeczko article ran, another story concerning background
checks was discussed.
An FBI fugitive, wanted in connection
with a 1983 Los Angeles bank robbery, elluded capture when he was found
to be working under an assumed name on campus at the University of Maryland-Eastern
Shore. Doesn't anybody read resumes anymore?
I have gone to school for some time to
earn the degrees necessary for my chosen field of law enforcement. I have
taken the classes, joined the clubs that look good to recruiters, made
sure my record is clean and that the people I hang around with will not
make me look guilty by association. That's right, no golf with O.J.
We live in the age of world-wide fax's,
credit card sized telephones and computers that can fit in your pocket,
but no one at the D.A.'s office can find out the guy they just hired may
have killed a guy in San Pedro just twenty miles up the road. I guess technology
does not replace good old investigative skills.
I hope Mr. Horeczko sues to get his job
back and I hope he wins. If not, I would suggest a career as a defense
attorney. Better to have a lawyer who knows both sides of the road then
just the straight and narrow path. |