L.B. City Council affirms gun control measures
By Tom Harshbarger
Daily Forty-Niner
The Long Beach City Council voted 7-2 Tuesday
to approve an ordinance that will drastically affect licensed gun dealers
in the city.
The ordinance, sponsored by Councilman
Dan Baker, 2nd District, calls for gun dealers to obtain $1 million of
liability insurance by Jan. 1, 2001, and bans all firearm sales on city-owned
property. The proposal also calls for more rigorous enforcement of a 1992
ordinance banning home gun sales.
The liability insurance would also make
the city exempt from any lawsuits.
Some citizens who sell guns at home said
they were unaware of the 1992 ordinance and have been getting their licenses
renewed regularly with no problem. At Baker's suggestion a three-month
grace period was added to the ordinance, along with a promise to make sure
the word gets out this time.
Both councilors and citizens vigorously
debated the issue for more than two hours.
"Gun violence has become a tragic epidemic,"
Baker said. "No one is safe from the indiscriminate risk of injury or death
by firearms, and its toll on society is staggering."
Despite the sensitive nature of the topic,
the debate stayed relatively calm on both sides of the issue. One man,
though, did go so far as to compare Baker to Adolf Hitler.
Mayor Beverly O'Neill divided the citizens
into two lines to speak at the podium: supporters and detractors. Luis
Tolley, western regional director of Handgun Control Inc., which lobbies
for gun control laws, was among the supporters.
Sarah Brady, the wife of former White House
Press Secretary Jim Brady, who was critically wounded in the 1981 assassination
attempt on Ronald Reagan, is the organization's chairwoman.
"We've seen that actions that are taken
by cities like Long Beach are tremendously important," Tolley said. What
the City Council does "will have repercussions throughout the state."
While many citizens were voicing their
opinions, as many as four councilors at a time left the council chamber.
One audience member chastised the councilors for their apparent lack of
interest.
Many of the arguments against the ordinance
cited Second Amendment protection as well as adverse economic impact. The
high insurance policy, critics argued, would force many gun stores to close
shop or move to other communities.
Councilman Jerry Shultz, 9th District,
said inadequate jail sentences are the problem, not firearms dealers. He
proposed the matter be sent to the city's Public Safety Committee for further
review; the rest of the council did not support that motion.
"I'm concerned that if we establish a process,
we don't pick and choose what issues come before Public Safety," Shultz
said. "If gun control is not a public safety issue, abolish the committee.
I'll step off of it."
Councilman Jeffrey Kellogg, 8th District,
and Shultz both voted against the plan. Kellogg said he felt the bill essentially
did nothing new; the city has never allowed gun shows on municipal property. |