SCED  550

Current Issues & Research in Science Education

Catalog Copy:

Prerequisite:  Admission to Science Education M.S. program. SCED 550 is a core course required of all Science Education M.S. candidates. This survey course introduces students to the body of research and practical knowledge shared by the science education community. Course work includes studying and discussing articles chosen from the science education literature relevant to key issues in science education. (Course requirements include attending local, state, or national science teachers conventions.)

BASIC INFORMATION

Semester: Fall 2004

Instructor: Alan Colburn

Classroom: PH1-218

Meeting Time: W 4:00-6:50 p.m.

Office: FO5-132

Office Hours: Tu, Th 11-12. These times don't work well for most of you, I know, but I usually respond to e-mails quickly, and I am on campus almost every day. Let me know when you want to come.

Telephone: 562 985 5948

E-mail: acolburn@csulb.edu

OVERVIEW OF THE COURSE & COURSE GOALS

Welcome to the CSULB M.S. program in Science Education!

This course is first in the three-course sequence that is at the heart of the Science Education M.S. degree. ScEd 550 is designed to introduce you to the field of science education as a scholarly discipline. In this class you will study things like science education's history, current issues in our field, and become familiar with the reasons we study these problems. You’ll get to know some of the journals making up our professional literature and meet local science education leaders. You’ll explore new issues, including those that might become the basis for your thesis/project, while simultaneously building upon the knowledge you gained during your credential program and time in the K-12 classroom.

My overarching mission is to create a class introducing you to the big picture of science education. I want to help you see your profession through a different lens. The goal is not to replace your day to day classroom viewpoint, but to enhance it. The ability to see your profession with various viewpoints is a necessary quality for any educational leader. And creating educational leaders is one of the overarching goals of the CSULB M.S. in Science Education program.

This 'big picture' viewpoint includes things like thinking about your discipline’s history, understanding how and why people have justified science being part of the school curriculum, the major issues to which we attend, seeing the kinds of things written in various journals, learning about beginning teachers and induction (since they are the group many science educators often work with), what's going on with science education at the state and national levels, etc. Along the way you’ll become familiar with some of the scholarly literature of the discipline and become better skilled at understanding the style of scholarly work in education.

As one of my colleagues said, the purpose of the class (and indeed the entire M.S. program) is for you to head toward a point where you can hold your own when talking with anyone about science teaching and the science education discipline!

REQUIRED COURSE MATERIALS

Text: DeBoer, G.E. (1991). A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press. This text is available at the university book store. It’s a paperback book that costs ~$25.

Course Reader: a package of photocopied articles. Available at One Stop Business Center, 5710 E 7th, 961-1976 (open most nights until 8 pm).

Optional Text: Colburn, A. (2003). The Lingo of Learning: 88 Education Terms Every Science Teacher Should Know. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. I put this on the list solely for students who feel intimidated by a lack of science education background. If you have never had a Science Methods course, you might find the book a handy reference. It's in the library at Q181 .C5265.

ASSIGNMENTS & ASSESSMENT

Course grades will be based on these assignments:

• Reading, participation, short essays (20%):  With a class this small, you will definitely participate extensively. If you’re unprepared for class for some reason, it will be pretty obvious. Sometimes you will be responsible for developing guiding questions to examine and clarify readings (perhaps posted on-line for classmates to read prior to their reading of the assignment), providing a summary of articles, or leading a portion of the weekly seminar. There’s also times when you will be responsible for finding an article(s) for everyone in the class to read.

The class will also include a few small essays. I'll assign them as the class goes on, and post the information below. These assignments are short--one page maximum--and designed to get you thinking about issues. For these short essays I'll be grading on the basis of simple effort + cogency. A student will receive an A if it looks to me like s/he responded in a way reflecting serious thought, written clearly:

Essay #1: As you begin your study toward an M.S. in Science Education you probably have ideas about the goals of science education, i.e., the reasons schools should offer science, and why students should take science. We'll brainstorm a list in class. Afterwards, choose a goal that seems particularly important to you and write a paragraph supporting the value of this goal for all citizens.

Essay #2: Write a short essay around this sentence stem: 'When someone leaves my class they will think science is…' (How do you think your students define science, after being with you for a year?) If you're not content with the picture of science your students are currently receiving, then continue your essay around this sentence stem: 'Someday, when someone leaves my class I hope they will think science is..." (How would you like students to define science, after being with you for a year?)

Essay #3: This short essay builds on what you wrote for Essay #2. Based on this last essay, now go on to write about 'I feel good about this because...' (Why do you think it's important for your students to define science the way they do? What's your rationale?)

• DeBoer Assignment (15%): Teachers often think of education as being rather faddish. Ideas come and go. Most 'new' science teaching methods or ideas are, in fact, quite old--as you know, having now read DeBoer's book. Choose an educational outcome (goal) or broad instructional technique (method) that you advocate strongly. First, provide a brief justification for your goal/method. If you picked a goal, very briefly describe accompanying methods & if you picked a method, very briefly describe one or two supported goals.

Next, based on your reading of DeBoer's book, outline when your goal/method was more and less supported, along with examples or other support. You don't need to write lengthy descriptions or provide long quotes; I read the book.

Finally, try to figure out (social) conditions that tend to lead to or support your goal/method. Under what conditions does (or will) it fluorish? Also, what conditions lead to the goal/method being de-emphasized? See if you can predict when your goal/method will return to the forefront of discussions about educational reform.

• Curriculum Project (20%): Today's hands-on science curricula owe a lot to their predecessors from the 1960's. Many still popular activities were created for these projects. The purpose of this assignment is for you to become familiar with one of the successful "alphabet soup" curricula (so named because they were know via acronyms), and educate your classmates about the project. You'll ultimately write a paper (and give a presentation) in which you provide this information:

  1. The project's title, including a translation for its acronym
  2. A broad overview of the project--its philosophy, goals, and rationale
  3. A brief history of the project and its development, including discussion about the project's overall acceptance within the educational community
  4. Detailed description of one unit from the project, including assessment
  5. Discussion about how you think the project could/would fit in today's classrooms--is the project outdated or still applicable?

• Grant Proposal (10%): Write a grant proposal for a classroom project. I will help you a little to find different granting agencies and proposal forms. For the assignment you will write a proposal, complete with budget. You will hand in a copy of the proposal and--probably--supporting documentation that accompanied the proposal. (Check with me to confirm this last point. You may not need to hand in supporting documentats that are merely photocopies of school-related information.) (Successful funding is not a requirement.)

OR

• Conference Proposal (10%). Students are required to present at a conference sometime before receiving their M.S. For this assignment you will submit a presentation proposal, or at least complete the proposal for a hypothetical presentation you will hopefully give someday soon. Beside the proposal you’ll also provide: a list of the materials needed for the presentation, an outline of the presentation, and copies of handouts you’ll give attendees. As I write this I am trying to make arrangements to facilitate your presenting at a local conference this semester.

• Mini-literature review (35% for paper+presentation): You will conduct a literature review for a specific science education issue. You will present your findings in class—in a manner similar to that of a paper presented at a conference—and submit a scholarly literature review paper. The paper should include comparison between research-oriented and practitioner-oriented articles on the same topic. The presentation will include discussion about the classroom implications of research articles.

Examples of research-oriented journals available at CSULB include: Journal of Science Teacher Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, School Science & Mathematics, Science Education, Educational Leadership, and Phi Delta Kappan.

Examples of practitioner-oriented journals here include: The Science Teacher, Science Scope, Science & Children, American Biology Teacher, Journal of Chemical Education, The Physics Teacher, and Journal of Geology Education.

Just about any topic, with instructor approval, is fair game. Examples include—but are not limited to:

Standards
Scientific Literacy
Teaching Strategies
Lectures
Laboratories
Constructivism
Inquiry
Demonstrations
Misconception/conceptual change
Questioning strategies
Problem solving

Integration (i.e., reading and writing to learn science)
Science, Technology and Society
Problem based learning
Assessment
Gender issues, equity, inclusion
English as Second Language
Informal science education
Technology in the science classroom
Urban science teaching
Parent involvement, school-home connections

 

This assignment is an opportunity for to to explore a topic area you would like to understand better. As you think about this assignment, think also about your thesis/project. No one expects you to know what you’re going to do for your thesis at this stage of your grad student time! In fact, classes like ScEd 550 give you the chance to think about and explore various ideas. However, if you have a broad sense of area(s) you would like to investigate, you can use the assignment to explore the ideas, helping you decide whether they are interesting enough to be thesis-worthy.

It's difficult for me to provide you with specific details about aspects of this assignment like length and number of references. However, I realize students desire some sort of guidance so, as a starting point, think about a paper that is 8-15 pages long (double spaced) with 10-15 references. If the references are mostly from educational research journals you can probably be closer to ten references.

Here are some broad questions to address in your writing:
* What's the topic? (Duh.)
* What drew you to the topic?
* Why is the topic important for other educators to understand?
* When you examined the literature on the topic, what broad categories of sub-topics did you find addressed?
* What studies seem to be particularly important? (Why do you think so?) (You may want to fold this part of the paper into the other sections.)
* Synthesize what the literature says in some of the key sub-topics. (Assume your reader probably won't go read all these articles, and show the reader that you have read, understood, and thought about the work -- we are counting on you, as the expert, to help us separate the more important "stuff" from the less important stuff.) This section and the next are the key parts of the paper.
* What are the key implications of the research for practicing teachers?
* Because educational research papers tend to use APA formatting, use APA formatting.

COURSE POLICIES

Deadlines Assignments are expected to be handed in on time. Late assignments will be marked down unless arrangements have been made with the instructor before the assignment is due.

Attendance, Participation Attendance and participation are essential components of this course. If you don't come, and talk, class won't work! You and your classmates' ideas need to be heard for individual and collective growth to occur. As such, your final course grade will reflect your level of attendance and participation: an "A" student will have attended virtually all classes and participated in each.

I understand, of course, that things happen. I don't want you coming to class if you have a contagious disease, for example! So, you can miss one class session (of 15 total) without a penalty. However, if you miss two sessions you will have missed more than 10% of the total class time. In a class like this, you can't miss that much class and learn as much as if you were present and participating. Thus, your final grade will decrease 5% if you miss two class sessions, 10% if you miss three class sessions, etc. If you know weeks beforehand that you will miss a class, please let me know.

Grading Traditional grading only. Attendance and participation in class are required. Clear communication is important as well as the ability to synthesize complex ideas. Students earning an A will demonstrate excellent written and oral communication skills and an ability to think critically about issues related to science education.

Disability Students with disabilities who need reasonable modifications, special assistance, or accommodations in this course should promptly direct their request to the course instructor. If a student with a disability feels that modifications, special assistance, or accommodations offered are inappropriate or insufficient, s/he should seek the assistance of the Director of Disabled Student Services on campus

TENTATIVE COURSE SCHEDULE

You and I will fill in certain schedule details as the course progresses.

Week

Date

Class Topic

Assignment Due Today

1

Sept 1

Intro course; registration; answer questions; course overview; learn to do ERIC searches; students tour campus and dept libraries; learn how to find references

 

--

2

Sept 8

Discuss reading; discuss articles found via ERIC; examine standards documents

DeBoer ch. 1;
Course Pack: Weiss & Pasley; Crockett; Find an NSTA article, read it, present to classmates

3

Sept 15

Discuss reading; intro to constructivism & inquiry

DeBoer ch. 2; Essay #1; Course Pack: Anderson; Lorsbach & Tobin; Kyle & Symansky (Research Matters); Rowe

4

Sept 22

Discuss reading; inquiry, assessment (cont'd) or ...?? Guest Speaker: TBA

Conference/Grant Proposal assignment due; DeBoer ch. 3
Course Pack: Demers

5

Oct 6

Discuss reading; do activity, discuss re: inquiry, assessment, nature of science; intro to reading research studies
Guest Speaker: TBA

DeBoer ch. 4; Course Pack: Lemann (parts I and II)

6

Oct 13

Discuss reading; curriculum project presentations. Guest Speaker: TBA

Curriculum Assignment; Course Pack: Tretter & Jones

7

Oct 20

Discuss reading; curriculum project presentations (cont'd). Guest Speaker :TBA

DeBoer ch. 5; Course Pack: Smith & Anderson

8

Oct 27

Discuss reading; curriculum project presentations (cont'd). Guest Speaker: TBA

DeBoer ch. 6; Course Pack: Ingersoll, CDE, Haycock; read for lit review

9

Oct 29

Discuss reading; curriculum project presentations (cont'd). Guest Speaker:TBA

DeBoer ch. 7; Course Pack: Novak; read for lit review

10

Nov 3

Discuss reading; curriculum project presentations (cont'd). Guest Speaker: TBA

 

DeBoer ch. 8; Course Pack: Karplus; read for lit review

11

Nov 10

Discuss reading; curriculum project presentations (cont'd). Guest Speaker: TBA

DeBoer ch. 9; Course Pack: Piaget; finish reading, begin writing lit review

12

Nov 17

Discuss reading; lit review presentations. Guest Speaker: TBA

DeBoer ch. 10; Course Pack: Rochelle et al.; continue writing lit review

13

Nov 24

Discuss reading; lit review presentations (cont'd)

 

Course Pack: Caine & Caine; Bruer; Lit Review assignment

14

Dec 1

Discuss reading; lit review presentations (cont'd)

DeBoer ch. 11

15

Dec 8

Lit review presentations (cont'd)

DeBoer assignment