| Term | Total Headcount Enrollment | Lower Division Headcount | Upper Division Headcount | Graduate Headcount | Post- Baccalaureate Headcout | Non-Degree Headcount | Total FTF Enrollment * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2001 | 33,259 | 10,128 (30.5%) | 17,077 (51.3%) | 3,472 (10.4%) | 2,467 (7.4%) | 115 (0.3%) | 25,292 |
| Fall 2002 | 34,566 | 9,434 (27.3%) | 18,268 (52.8%) | 3,765 (10.9%) | 2,930 (8.5%) | 169 (0.5%) | 26,480 |
| Fall 2003 | 34,715 | 9,304 (26.8%) | 18,629 (53.7%) | 3,828 (11.0%) | 2,805 (8.1%) | 149 (0.4%) | 26,606 |
| Fall 2004 | 33,479 | 9,093 (27.2%) | 18,033 (53.9%) | 3,964 (11.8%) | 2,314 (6.9%) | 75 (0.2%) | 26,009 |
| Fall 2005 | 34,547 | 9,651 (27.9%) | 18,771 (54.3%) | 4,011 (11.6%) | 2,009 5.8%) | 105 (0.3%) | 27,060 |
| Term | Total Headcount Enrollment | Full-Time | Part-Time | On-Campus Location | Off-Campus Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2001 | 33,259 | 23,190 (69.7%) | 10,069 (30.3%) | 33,259 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Fall 2002 | 34,566 | 23,875 (69.1%) | 10,691 (30.9%) | 34,566 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Fall 2003 | 34,715 | 23,996 (69.1%) | 10,719 (30.9%) | 34,715 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Fall 2004 | 33,479 | 23,633 (70.6%) | 9,846 (29.4%) | 33,479 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Fall 2005 | 34,547 | 24,951 (72.2%) | 9,596 (27.8%) | 34,547 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
* This table reports only on-campus, state-supported headcount enrollments. Off-campus/distance-learning enrollments at CSULB are generated totally by self-support instructional programs and are reported separately in Part I, Item 8.
| Term | Granted | Associate | Bachelor | Post- Baccalaureate | Master | Doctorate | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-2001 | 5,730 | 0 (0%) | 4,520 (78.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2,210 (21.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| 2001-2002 | 6,245 | 0 (0%) | 5,107 (81.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1,138 (18.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| 2002-2003 | 6,237 | 0 (0%) | 5,347 (85.7%) | 0 (0%) | 890 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| 2003-2004 | 6,668 | 0 (0%) | 5,5400 (83.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1,128 (16.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| 2004-2005 | 7,626 | 0 (0%) | 6,193 (81.2%) | 0 (0%) | 1,433 (18.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0(0%) |
| Term | Total Faculty Headcount | Full-Time Faculty | Part-Time Faculty | Total Faculty FTF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall 2001 | 2,145 | 971 (45.3%) | 1,174 (54.7%) | 1,289.90 |
| Fall 2002 | 2,165 | 989 (45.7%) | 1,176 (54.3%) | 1,324.10 |
| Fall 2003 | 2,073 | 1,008 (48.6%) | 1,065 (51.4%) | 1,308.20 |
| Fall 2004 | 1,944 | 960 (49.4%) | 984 (50.6%) | 1,237.80 |
| Fall 2005 | 2,159 | 989 (45.8%) | 1,170 (54.2%) | 1,323.40 |
| Term | Return on Net Assets | Net Income Ratio | Operating Income Ratio | Viability Ratio | Instructional Expenses per Student | Net Tuition per Student |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-2001 | 5,730 | 0 (0%) | 4,520 (78.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2,210 (21.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| 2001-2002 | 6,245 | 0 (0%) | 5,107 (81.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1,138 (18.2%) | 0 (0%) |
| 2002-2003 | 6,237 | 0 (0%) | 5,347 (85.7%) | 0 (0%) | 890 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) |
| 2003-2004 | 6,668 | 0 (0%) | 5,5400 (83.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1,128 (16.9%) | 0 (0%) |
| 2004-2005 | 7,626 | 0 (0%) | 6,193 (81.2%) | 0 (0%) | 1,433 (18.8%) | 0 (0%) |
We are missing the newest Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators from departments
These introductory remarks are intended to provide some context for the following data tables. CSULB currently offers 150 degree programs, including 82 baccalaureates, 66 masters, and 2 doctoral degrees. Additional degree options, minors, credentials, and certificates exist but are not included in these tables.
The information for the following attachment was compiled from several sources. The first is a new annual report on assessment. This requirement was adopted in fall 2005, and the first reports were received in June, 2006. Compared to only a 20% response rate in previous voluntary surveys, information was provided by 98% of programs. Part of the increased success can be attributed to decisions in the past two years to appoint an assessment coordinator in each of the seven colleges and to decentralize most funding for assessment activities to the colleges as well.
Recently completed self-studies and program review reports provided the second source of data for these tables. Using a program review policy adopted in spring 2005, the new Program Assessment and Review Council made great progress, conducting 26 reviews in 2005-2006 involving 46 individual degrees. About half the programs reviewed have already progressed through the final stage of signing a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that will direct their efforts over the next program review cycle. These MOU stipulate that all programs will conduct assessment of student learning.
A third source of information came from professional accreditation documents for programs with accreditation. CSULB has a large number of accredited programs, as can be seen by the notation in the last column of the following tables. The majority of these programs have already used evidence of student learning for improvement in degrees in the arts, business, education, engineering, and health and human services.
The process of gathering data for the following tables proved to be a learning experience for the campus. A number of different forms, templates, and matrices were used to report assessment information in June 2006. For ease and uniformity of data collection, plans are underway to establish a web-based template for future reports that will be continuously updated by the individual degree programs. A review of the content of the reports revealed some interesting assessment successes among programs that have already closed the loop; however, it also disclosed the number of programs that have yet to complete a full assessment cycle. For example, 83% of all programs reported formal learning outcomes, and 82% reported where these outcomes are published. Another 78% of programs indicated the assessment activities they intend to conduct in the 2006-2007 academic year. This information has helped to shape campus plans for faculty development in the coming academic year.
The goal for the 2007 annual assessment reports is for all programs to have published student learning outcomes, to have used measures other than GPA to assess student learning, and to have used or have a plan to use the results of assessment for program improvement. By 2008, all programs should have closed the assessment loop, and the results should be evident in future self-studies for program review.
